I am trying to reduce the space between a subheading and a two column multicol. I have tried to change the margins on both the mutlticol and the heading, however it has lead me to no avail.

This is what I have written for the multicol / header (the data is just dummy data):


This is the output from this:


(Note: the Language section is as expected. That is what I am going for.)

This amount of white-space is too much, and no already answered questions that I could find seems to be addressing this. I believe I did read an answer saying that multicol may not be the correct solution, but I would assume there has to be a way to squish that space to make it more consistent.

  • 1
    Welcome to TeX.SX! Please make your code compilable (if possible), or at least complete it with \documentclass{...}, the required \usepackage's, \begin{document}, and \end{document}. That may seem tedious to you, but think of the extra work it represents for TeX.SX users willing to give you a hand. Help them help you: remove that one hurdle between you and a solution to your problem. Sep 11, 2015 at 7:03
  • 1
    Also, if you do provide code, please provide it as text and not as a picture. I'm not going to painfully type in your code, let me copy it from here. Sep 11, 2015 at 7:05
  • What about \setlength{\multicolsep}{0pt} or whatever you need? Hard to give better advice since you are using custom commands and aren't providing us with their definitions....
    – jon
    Sep 13, 2015 at 21:40

1 Answer 1


You could try using minipages instead of multicols. That way, you can also vary a bit with the horizontal alignment of the text by adding \centering and changing the textwidth.

\item An item;
\item Another item;
\item Yet another;
\item And another.

Edit: It does add the downside of having to split the list manually, but as far as I can see when testing it the problem of the vertical gap is gone

  • Why the figure environment? \noindent is all you need. Sep 12, 2015 at 12:21
  • It has become a bit of a habit. I use minipages a lot, almost always for figures and tables. You're right, I will change it
    – Robin
    Sep 13, 2015 at 21:27

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .