152

When trying to write an e-mail address, there are always problems with the @ sign.

Solutions I've seen suggested are using some verbatim environment (more difficult in footnotes) and using a math-mode @.

What is the correct way to do this?

3
  • Additionally you can redefine the arrobase (@) to be a different font and/or size. Thats why I do for my resume to make it really pop!
    – machinaut
    Jul 27, 2010 at 21:20
  • egreg's answer here is the way to go. Feb 4, 2014 at 14:28
  • If you dont need an actual link, use the 'url' package and the \url{} command. Jul 15, 2015 at 2:00

10 Answers 10

168

Another thing one can to with the hyperref package is to use the href command

\href{mailto:[email protected]}{[email protected]}

which has the advantage that when clicked-on in an electronic document, it will (ideally) call up the mailer and cue up the e-mail address.

8
  • 38
    I often define an \email command that expands to your \href, automatically prepending the mailto: part. Jul 27, 2010 at 7:53
  • 7
    Good idea. One small caveat is that <code>\email</code> is already defined in certain document classes (for example <code>amsart</code>). Jul 27, 2010 at 13:45
  • 6
    @user25957 TeXWorks is an editor. It doesn't matter if you use TeXWorks, TeXShop, TeXMaker, TeXNicCenter, TeXLipse, Notepad, Emacs, Gedit, or whatever. It will always invoke the TeX distribution on your computer (TeX Live or possibly MiKTeX on Windows) which will most probably include hyperref.
    – marczellm
    Feb 4, 2014 at 13:35
  • 1
    Thank you for sharing this, but I have always been wondering if there is a way to create something like "click and copy to clipboard". Because clicking on a \href link always redirects me to an email client, which I do not use! So it makes more sense for me if I can just click on the email address and it is copied to my clipboard! Is it even possible in LaTeX? Thanks!
    – zyy
    Oct 6, 2019 at 1:01
  • 5
    For the lazy, @DamienPollet meant: use \newcommand{\email}[1]{\href{mailto:#1}{#1}} somewhere in your preamble, that'll do just fine.
    – Clément
    Mar 12, 2021 at 17:40
69

You can also combine the hyperref and url approaches to get a working link that is formatted like an URL:

\href{mailto:[email protected]}{\nolinkurl{[email protected]}}
27

Just to add to Willie's good answer, in terms of the formatting (as the OP seems to be getting at) there isn't a "correct" way. Use \textsf or \texttt or whatever looks good for your particular document and use case and font choice. Also try the randtext package to attempt to obfuscate the email address inside the PDF to make it less susceptible to spammers (but note that — I think — it doesn't play nice with hyperref's \href).

If you want to "special-case" the @ sign without adding markup to your text, you could write something like this:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{color,hyperref}
    \catcode`\_=11\relax
    \newcommand\email[1]{\_email #1\q_nil}
    \def\_email#1@#2\q_nil{%
      \href{mailto:#1@#2}{{\emailfont #1\emailampersat #2}}
    }
    \newcommand\emailfont{\sffamily}
    \newcommand\emailampersat{{\color{red}\small@}}
    \catcode`\_=8\relax    
\begin{document}
\email{[email protected]}
\end{document}

where you get the proper hyperlinking of the email address and you can customise the look of the email by changing \emailfont and the look of the ampersat (or arrobase, or @) by changing \emailampersat.

1
  • 1
    Yeah.. mentioning randtext was exactly what I needed. Just curious... does your command still produce a working hyperlink if I wrap a randtext{} around it? I suppose not... Jun 4, 2017 at 9:48
18

You can define \at command in the preamble:

\newcommand{\at}{\makeatletter @\makeatother}

and then use it as follows within the document:

myemail\at gmail.com
3
  • 7
    The catcode of @ in \at is the catcode that was set for @ at the time of the definition. If the catcode of @ should be "letter", then it is defined via \makeatletter\newcommand*{\at}{@}\makeatother. However, the catcode "letter" or "other" does not matter here, thus \newcommand*{\at}{@} would be enough or just using @. Feb 4, 2014 at 15:26
  • I can read this comment above twenty times and still be confused. Sounds like Alan Greenspan quote: I know that you think you know what I said. But I'm not sure whether you understood that what you heard is what I meant.
    – DrBeco
    Feb 5 at 3:53
  • haha it's usual feeling when trying to read Tex manuals ;-) Feb 9 at 18:59
17

Very simple solution from here:

\texttt{[email protected]}

1
  • The curly grouping braces around @ are not needed. Mar 18, 2018 at 1:38
11

If you don't like how the at-symbol of the default font looks (I don't), you may borrow it from the Times font, like so: youraddres{\fontfamily{ptm}\selectfont @}example.com

0
4

For the @ character I prefer the \MVAt command from the marvosym package, since the cmss @ looks so different from other fonts I'm used to. For the full address I use the hyperref formatting suggested by Willie.

3

I don't think that there is a unique correct way to handle this. As another answer says, you can use hyperref. But, the url package can also be used to render email addresses:

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{url}

\begin{document}

\url{[email protected]}

\end{document}
6
  • 1
    You don't want to use \url because it will attempt to create a hyperlink to an actual URL with the email address you supply. See Caramdir's answer for a better solution. Aug 18, 2010 at 10:11
  • 1
    @WillRobertson: You sure about that? Note that this was \url from the url package, not from hyperref.
    – vanden
    Aug 18, 2010 at 15:10
  • 4
    Oops; I meant only if you load hyperref as well -- it will transparently replace \url with the hyperlinked one. The point is that \url is not semantically designed for email addresses. Aug 19, 2010 at 3:32
  • Logical markup can be defined with package url via \DeclareUrlCommand\email{} and used as \email{[email protected]}. Feb 4, 2014 at 15:29
  • Would this logical markup works if both the url and hyperref packages are loaded, @HeikoOberdiek ?
    – DrBeco
    Feb 5 at 3:43
3

I defined a command, to avoid the redundancy of Willie Wong's and Caramdir's answers, and to allow protocols other than mailto:

\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{xstring}

\newcommand{\thelink}{\@empty}
\newcommand{\link}[2]{%
  \IfSubStr{#1}{:}{\renewcommand\thelink{#1}}{\renewcommand\thelink{#1:#2}}%
  \href{\thelink}{\texttt{#2}}%
}

There's a long form, where the URL is different than the text, and the short form, where the protocol is catenated with the text to make up the URL:

Phone: \link{tel:1234567890}{+1 234-567-890} \\
E-mail: \link{mailto}{[email protected]}

Produces this result:

latex rendered output

I use \texttt instead of \nolinkurl, because the latter removed spaces from the supplied text.

1

There are a number of things that you can try:

(with the hyperref package):

\url{email address}

or more simply (for monospace font):

\texttt{email address}

1
  • 6
    You don't want to use \url because it will attempt to create a hyperlink to an actual URL with the email address you supply. See Caramdir's answer for a better solution. Aug 18, 2010 at 10:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .