I am trying to submit a LaTeX file to the arXiv which uses biblatex. However, it fails whatever I do.

I first get the message

biblatex.sty is not found

I have tried including (all from TeXLive 2010) biblatex.sty but then I get

logreq.sty is missing then logreq.def is missing

then

! Package biblatex Error: Outdated 'etoolbox' package.

I then tried adding etoolbox.sty and etoolbox.def and get

! Package biblatex Error: Style 'alphabetic' not found

So I added alphabetic.bbx then standard.bbx then alphabetic.cbx and finally I get

! Package biblatex Error: Autocite command 'inline' undefined

I also tried incorporating the bib into the main LaTeX file as in biblatex submitting to a journal but it doesn't help.

Has anyone successfully used biblatex with the arXiv and if so, how?

  • how are you compiling you *.tex document? – lynxoid Aug 30 '11 at 18:34
  • 1
    @lynxoid: please don't use the answer space for questions or comments. I converted your "answer" to a comment on the question. – Stefan Kottwitz Aug 30 '11 at 18:36
  • 2
    A perhaps less time-consuming exercise: find a computer which is running TexLive 2009 (which is the one arXiv uses) and try to compile your document by putting all the biblatex files in its folder. As for your immediate problem, inline is defined in biblatex.def, which you'll need to include. You'll probably need all of the files in the biblatex root folder, and some more. But I don't have a TexLive 2009 available, so I can't test it for you. – Mateus Araújo Aug 31 '11 at 1:53
  • Thanks. Got it to work as described in my edit as getting hold of Texlive 2009 seemed like a pain. – Raphael Aug 31 '11 at 16:30
  • 4
    Good =) Perhaps you should answer your own question, instead of editing the question? That way it will appear as answered. Also, I don't see why you'd want to use the biblatex from TexLive 2009 instead of 2010 (or 2011, for that matter), the 2009 one is quite outdated. – Mateus Araújo Sep 1 '11 at 0:06

Just uploaded a paper with biblatex, and it works out of the box. Probably due to their switch to texlive 2011 at the end of 2011.

  • 2
    Small update: you can't submit BBL files created with TexLive 2012; they have to be created with TexLive 2011. – Teake Nutma Feb 8 '13 at 9:45

Update: As of February 10, 2017, arXiv has switched to TeX Live 2016. Hallelujah! It should now be possible to use biblatex when uploading to the arXiv (though this deserves a test).

Update 2: Having recently uploaded a paper to the arXiv, I can confirm it works without problems.


What is below is outdated but kept for posterity.

Starting with TeX Live 2016, no amount of tinkering was enough to get something that arXiv (which is still using TeXlive 2011) would accept.

  • Uploading all the needed files to arXiv is no longer an option. Indeed, the newest version of biblatex uses some macro from the package xstring that didn't exist in the 2011 version. The package xstring needs a file named xstring.tex. There is no way of telling arXiv that this isn't my main file (innocuously named "article.tex"), and so it tried to compile it. Obviously it didn't work.

  • This means that using biber is not an option, as the .bbl files produced by a new version of biber don't work with old version of biblatex. With TeXlive 2015 using the bibtex fallback worked, because bibtex was backwards-compatible enough that the .bbl files it produces worked with TeXlive 2011. This is no longer the case, as the produced .bbl file contains some macros that weren't present in the old TeXlive (I couldn't see all of them but the first that made the build fail was related to the sorting of entries).

My solution? I reinstalled the 5-years-old TeXlive 2011, ran the old version of pdflatex and then bibtex, and gave that .bbl file to arXiv.

  • This is just sad. – daejk Nov 29 '16 at 12:32
  • I just found out how to make xstring work: Rename xstring.tex into xstring.def and change the first line of xstring.sty to \input xstring.def. – daejk Nov 29 '16 at 12:42
  • concerning the update off this post (and maybe my post below) I actually uploaded to arXiv a few days ago and that was the first time, my first upload directly works. So it's really a Hallelujah :) – Ronny Feb 26 '17 at 9:35
  • But since arXiv don't update their TeX distribution continuously, it is quite unlikely that biblatex/Biber submissions will work for a long time. – moewe Mar 17 '17 at 8:57
  • Just a heads up that with a current version of biblatex uploads to the arXiv will create version incompatibility errors again, see tex.stackexchange.com/q/429436/35864 and links therein for details. – moewe Oct 1 at 18:55

Since last week, biber-style biblatex .bbl fiels should work (will try this week), because arXiv updated their system to TeXLive 2016, see https://arxiv.org/new#feb10_2017

  • Did you get this to work? Anyhow, I fear the happiness might only last a few months. biblatex and Biber are very sensitive when it comes to version mismatches and if arXiv don't update their biblatex versions it is quite likely that an update might break things. – moewe Mar 17 '17 at 8:58
  • It worked as smooth as possible, I really just uploaded my files and everything worked :) – Ronny Mar 17 '17 at 22:05
  • That is good to hear. (Just to be sure: You only uploaded your .tex and .bbl files?) But do keep an eye on the version issue, as soon as CTAN updates biblatex you could be out of luck. – moewe Mar 18 '17 at 5:59
  • Of course I just uploaded .tex and .bbl:) – Ronny Mar 20 '17 at 4:56

It should be enough to upload the bbl file, or include it in the main file (and remove the biblatex package from the preambule).

protected by Community Mar 16 '15 at 7:17

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.