How can I create "wasla" signs using arabxetex? Writing qad-i in.sarafa (an example from the arabtex documentation) produces:

enter image description here

In arabtex, it produces:

enter image description here

How can I get the same effect in arabxetex?

  • 1
    Try with qad i-n.sarafa with full voc option
    – Salim Bou
    Sep 29 '15 at 8:47

This is less an answer than a comment that’s too long for a comment.

Page 7 of the arabxetex manual includes verses from the Quran containing instances of waṣla:

sUraTu 'l-ssajdaTi

bi-'AyAtinA 'lla_dIna

`ani 'l-ma.dAji`i

tu_tIru 'l-'ar.da

tasq.I 'l-.har_ta


These examples don’t look quite like what I’d expect from the documentation of arabtex; and all but one of the examples of waṣla in the arabtex documentation produce bad results in arabxetex.

The example that works is wa-ismuhu. I can fix some of the other examples:

f--a-n.sarafa% not f--a-in.sarafa

'al-i-smu% not 'al-i-ismu

qad i-n.sarafa% not qad-i in.sarafa, as salim bou pointed out

yA i-bnI% not yA ibnI

h_a_dA i-bnuh_u% not h_a_dA ibnuh_u

'al-i-^stirA'u% not 'al-i-i^stirA'u

No luck yet with the remaining examples.

The documentation for arabxetex should address this, because it’s not just obvious how one is supposed to adapt the ASCII transliteration of arabtex for arabxetex.

  • You're a wizard! Should I send the arabxetex maintainer a note with a link to our discussion?
    – bzm3r
    Oct 30 '15 at 1:28
  • @user89 That may be a good idea. I worked this out at 3 o’clock in the morning, which may be why I couldn’t fix all the examples, but (still sleepy? and not really a wizard) I’ve had no more light on them. It would be nice if we could send the maintainer a complete account to insert into the documentation, but perhaps these cases will be enough to help someone else work out what’s going on.
    – Thérèse
    Oct 30 '15 at 1:40

See the output below




\<قَدِ ٱنْصَرَفَ.  >


enter image description here

  • Sure, but this uses arabtex, and not arabxetex. Also, it uses arabic input, rather than arabtex-like input.
    – bzm3r
    Sep 30 '15 at 4:45
  • Is there any reason why you want to stick with arabxetex?
    – CroCo
    Sep 30 '15 at 23:46
  • 1
    I thought it was more modern and up-to-date compared to arabtex? At least, that is the impression I got from its manual?
    – bzm3r
    Oct 1 '15 at 0:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.