I wrote a simple organic chemistry lab report example in which I am trying ACS style bibliography. In the reference section, I would like to have "st" in 1st to be superscript, but it's not working. I would greatly appreciate the community's input. Thank you! Here is a minimal working example:
labReport.tex
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{achemso}
\bibliographystyle{achemso}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{caption}
\captionsetup{belowskip=10pt,aboveskip=10pt}
\usepackage[a4paper,margin=1in]{geometry}
%Load math package
\usepackage{amsmath}
%Make cell space and scientific notation
\usepackage{longtable, cellspace, booktabs}
\setlength\cellspacetoplimit{4pt}
\setlength\cellspacebottomlimit{4pt}
\usepackage[table]{xcolor}
\usepackage{siunitx}
\sisetup{scientific-notation = true}
%bibliography source
\begin{filecontents}{job.bib}
@BOOK{Reich2007,
author = {Eike Reich and Anne Schibli},
title = {High-performance Thin-layer Chromatography for the Analysis of Medicinal Plant},
year = {2007},
publisher = {Thieme Georg Verlag},
address = {New York},
edition = {1$^{st}$},
}
\end{filecontents}
%Start writing the lab report
\begin{document}
\section{Results}
\subsection{Table}
%Data
\begin{longtable}{ Cr *{6}{l}SS}
\caption{Distance measurements and computation of Rf}\\
\toprule
& Substance & Number & Solvent dist.(mm) & Spot dist.(mm) & {Rf} \\
\midrule
\endfirsthead
\multicolumn{5}{c}{Table}\\[1ex]
\endfoot
\bottomrule
\caption*{The Rf values have three significant figures because the smallest number of significant figures used in Rf calculations (i.e. division) is three. The Rf values of acetaminophen and the unknown are the closest.}
\endlastfoot
& Caffeine & 1 & 64.0 & 12.0 & 0.188 \\
& Aspirin & 2 & 64.0 & 60.0 & 0.938 \\
& Acetaminophen & 3 & 64.0 & 41.5 & 0.648 \\
& Unknown & 110 & 64.0 & 43.0 & 0.672\\
\end{longtable}
\subsection{Calculation example}
\setlength{\jot}{8pt}
\begin{align*}
Rf_{Caffeine} &= \frac{Spot\: dist.}{Solvent\: dist.}\\
&= \frac{12.0\:mm}{64.0\:mm}\\
&= 0.18\textbf{8}
\end{align*}
\section{Conclusion}
The identity of the unknown substance \#110 is acetaminophen (i.e. solute) based on examination of Figure 1 and Rf values in Table 1.
Both the ethyl acetate/acetic acid solvent (i.e. mobile phase) and the TLC's silica gel (i.e. stationary phase) are polar.
Separation of compounds is based on the competition of the solute and the mobile phase for binding places on the stationary phase \cite{Reich2007}.
The less polar compound moves further up the TLC plate, resulting in a larger Rf value.
Therefore, this experiment suggests that caffeine is the most polar of all three compounds, whereas aspirin is the least polar.
In Figure 1, there is only one spot in each column, suggesting that cross-contamination between capillary tubes was minimal.
Faint cross-contamination spots may have appeared had the UV light been used in a darker environment.
Another potential source of error is not spotting enough solution onto the TLC plate but there was four clear spots, so it does not seem to have been a problem.
\bibliography{job}
\end{document}
edition
field should contain only a number; it's the bibliography style that decides how to typeset it, as a word, an ordinal or whatever. Besides,1$^st$
is wrong under many respects.