I am using counters to save positive integers, something like that:


Is there any limit in the value I can save in a counter, in this case mycountervalue? And what is the exact limit?

Thanks! I do not want to get an unexpected overflow.

  • 1
    I would say 2^31-1 with e-TeX extensions
    – user31729
    Oct 1, 2015 at 13:04
  • Thaks for your quick answer! Well, I am not using e-TeX extensions... Oct 1, 2015 at 13:08
  • 1
    @loved.by.Jesus are you sure? That would be quite strange nowadays. A modern LaTeX kernel assumes etex available, many packages do as well.
    – cgnieder
    Oct 1, 2015 at 13:22
  • 1
    @loved.by.Jesus: I confused the e-TeX extensions with the register range. The register range hasn't change, but the numbers of registers have increased.
    – user31729
    Oct 1, 2015 at 13:28
  • @clemens: I had no idea what e-TeX was :-\, thanks for your explanation. Oct 1, 2015 at 13:33

2 Answers 2


The maximum value is the 'usual' 2^31-1 long integer value, as well as the negative range from -2^31, so the full range is 2^32 integers possible.

2^31-1 is 2147483647, which is the largest possible integer usable for counters or \ifnum and \numexpr codes.

In the code below I stored this number to the counter \mycounter and print it several times after using \stepcounter. After the first \stepcounter the register overflows and the number is set to -2147483648, being the 'largest' negative number possible. A subsequent \stepcounter works normally then.

The e-TeX standard extended the limit of 256 registers (count, skip etc.) to 32568 possible registers (for each type)





\themycounter  % prints 2147483647 

\stepcounter{mycounter}  % Now the overflow will occur

\themycounter % prints -2147483648


\themycounter % -2147483647

enter image description here

  • 1
    Hey that is a nice coded answer! You got it. Oct 1, 2015 at 13:13
  • @loved.by.Jesus: You're welcome
    – user31729
    Oct 1, 2015 at 13:19

According to The TEXbook:

TEX has 256 registers called \count0 to \count255, each capable of containing integers between -2147483647 and +2147483647, inclusive; i.e., the magnitudes should be less than 231.

  • 4
    A very minor detail: The minimal possible value of a counter is -2147483648=-2^{31}, not -2147483647. (There are 2^{32} integers between -2147483648 and +2147483647...)
    – Mico
    Oct 10, 2015 at 14:52
  • @Mico does that mean The TeXBook has a typo?
    – Symbol 1
    Oct 22, 2021 at 2:27
  • @Symbol1 - Oh no, did I commit an act of heresy against the Book of K?!
    – Mico
    Oct 22, 2021 at 3:39
  • I mean the other answer clearly shows that -21...48 is possible. So either TeXbook is wrong or the new compiler changed something.
    – Symbol 1
    Oct 22, 2021 at 3:41
  • @Symbol1 - Actually, there's no outright heresy. I wrote "The minimal possible value of a counter is -2147483648=-2^{31}, not -2147483647." However, while the minimal possible counter value, -2147483648, cannot be set directly, it can be reached by causing an overflow, as is demonstrated in the other answer. For sure, the Book of K has it right when it is said that the counter's "magnitude" (a synonym for "absolute value"?) should be less than 2^{31}. :-) Try running \setcounter{mycounter}{-2147483648} to verify that the Book of K is right.
    – Mico
    Oct 22, 2021 at 3:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.