5

Is there a way to produce blackboard bold Cyrillic letter?

(I know I can do Greek letters with mathbbol, but I need $\mathbb{Л}$.)

  • 5
    sadly, i don't know of any font that contains blackboard bold cyrillic. however, if you can find a published source in russian that uses these letters, they are good candidates for addition to unicode, and i would be happy to forward a request to the unicode committee. but they do require a published reference. – barbara beeton Oct 24 '15 at 22:38
  • Since you have some responses below that seem to answer your question, please consider marking one of them as ‘Accepted’ by clicking on the tickmark below their vote count (see How do you accept an answer?). This shows which answer helped you most, and it assigns reputation points to the author of the answer (and to you!). It's part of this site's idea to identify good questions and answers through upvotes and acceptance of answers. – user36296 Dec 23 '17 at 20:54
2

Not really pretty, but unless you find an open shape Cyrillic font, I see not much more to do.

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[russian]{babel}
\usepackage{amsmath}

\DeclareRobustCommand{\bbel}{%
  \mathord{\text{%
    \ooalign{%
      Л\cr
      \hidewidth\kern0.125em I\hidewidth\cr
    }%
  }%
}}

\begin{document}

$x\bbel y^{\bbel}$

\end{document}

enter image description here

2

For the particular symbol you mention you could fake it by adding a vertical rule to the symbol either to the left or right of the main vertical stem or (egreg's suggestion) print a capital I close to the symbol or double print the symbol with a small separation

Sample output

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[russian]{babel}

\begin{document}

Л

$\mbox{Л\kern-0.4em\vrule height 1.55ex depth 0ex width 0.08em}$

$\mbox{Л\kern-0.05em\vrule height 1.58ex depth 0ex width 0.08em}$

$\mbox{Л\kern-.15emI}$

$\mbox{Л\kern-0.9emЛ}$

\end{document}

But really one should go back to metafont and make a proper set of symbols.

  • Why not an I? There is in the repertoire. – egreg Oct 28 '16 at 12:36
  • @egreg Because I didn't think of such a good suggestion - now added to the samples above. – Andrew Swann Oct 28 '16 at 12:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.