Is it possible to define


as commands like this one would sometimes be easier to use.

  • 1
    Which engine do you use? This is awkward in pdfTeX, but easy enough with a UTF-8 engine.
    – Joseph Wright
    Sep 10, 2011 at 14:21
  • i guess you mean something like luatex with a utf-8 engine, i'm using pdflatex. Sep 10, 2011 at 15:06

1 Answer 1


If there were no argument to the macro, this would be just a matter of loading the newunicodechar package or using the \DeclareUnicodeCharacter macro. For the "character" to accept arguments, a slightly different approach is needed.

If you use XeTeX or LuaTeX, you can use either of




(The second approach is more robust.)

With pdfTeX the \√ syntax will not work because of the way pdfTeX handles input (it is theoretically possible to achieve this, though). This leaves the only way (taken and modified from newunicodechar documentation):



\expandafter\newcommand\csname u8:\detokenize{√}\endcsname[1]{%



  • thanks - curiously with luatex characters like '⟨','⟩' don't work well but otherwise - it is great. Definitely something i should have a look at. till now i've worked with pdflatex Sep 10, 2011 at 15:04
  • @epsilonhalbe: \newunicodechar{⟨}{\langle} \newunicodechar{⟩}{\rangle} works for me in LuaTeX and TeX Live 2011. Sep 10, 2011 at 15:13
  • ah thanks - most definitely should look at LuaTeX - should i watch something when migrating from pdfTeX, are there any complications/breaking points - looking through 20 pages for errors would be gruesome. Sep 10, 2011 at 15:28
  • 3
    @epsilonhalbe: See these questions: one two three Sep 10, 2011 at 16:08
  • the move to LuaLaTeX was the best thing TeXrelated I did in the last few months - thanks again. Dec 21, 2011 at 0:56

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .