The geometry's documentation tells:

  • page 9: "bindingoffset removes a specified space from the lefthand-side of the page for oneside or the inner-side for twoside.",
  • page 10 (caption of Figure 6): "The option bindingoffset adds the specified length to the inner margin. ".

This seems to be contradictory and, from line 748 of the code:


I guess bindingoffset adds the specified length to the inner (left) margin.

Anyway, bindingoffset seems to be ignored as shown by the following MWE: if bindingoffset > 0, the effective length of the left margin (shown by the page grid) is the left length (that is oddsidemargin + 1 inch, here 31mm) and not the left + bindingoffset length (here 41mm).

  bindingoffset                 & $=\printlength{\Gm@bindingoffset}$                 \\
  left (oddsidemargin + 1 inch) & $=\printlength{\leftplusoneinch}$                  \\
  left + bindingoffset          & $=\printlength{\leftplusoneinchplusbindingoffset}$ 

Hence my question: why geometry's bindingoffset seems to be ignored?

  • Use an extreme value of 10cm to better see differences. – Johannes_B Dec 14 '15 at 14:45
  • have you tried using \documentclass[twoside]{article}? does that help? – cmhughes Dec 14 '15 at 14:53
  • @Johannes_B Well, I better see differences but don't better understand :) – Denis Bitouzé Dec 14 '15 at 15:01
  • @cmhughes Yes: in fact I got this MWE from my real document which actually uses the two-sided book class. And it's with this class I first encountered the problem. So it doesn't help. – Denis Bitouzé Dec 14 '15 at 15:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.