4

I am trying to write a line of a formula as follows:

{\emph{P}($\emph{c}\mid\emph{d}$) =} \emph{P}(\emph{c})\prod \textsubscript{\emph{w}\in$\emph{d}}\emph{P}($\emph{w}\mid\emph{c}$) \textsuperscript{\emph{n}\textsubscript{\emph{wd}}}

Which should produce:

enter image description here

Yet upon compiling this LaTeX, I get:

! Missing $ inserted.
<inserted text> 
                $
l.658 ...\mid\emph{d}$) =} \emph{P}(\emph{c})\prod
                                                   \textsubscript{\emph{w}\i...

? 

I am not using the formula package because it is not something I know and this is the existing code I have to maintain.

Can anyone suggest why?

  • Formula package? Do you mean amsmath? You should use an introductory book on LaTeX, perhaps – user31729 Dec 30 '15 at 21:31
  • When I get the chance. This is what I have for now. – Mr Morgan Dec 30 '15 at 21:32
  • What do the $P$s for? Conditional probabilities? – Bernard Dec 30 '15 at 21:35
  • @Christian Hupfer: There does seem to be an old formula package, dating back to 1998, used to typeset physical units, the TeX Catalogue says… – Bernard Dec 30 '15 at 21:37
  • @Bernard: Never heard of it – user31729 Dec 30 '15 at 21:47
2

Without any formula package (;-))

 \documentclass{article}


\begin{document}

\begin{equation}
  P(c\mid d) = P(c) \prod_{w\in d} P(w\mid c)^{n_{wd}}
\end{equation}

Inline:   $P(c\mid d) = P(c) \prod_{w\in d} P(w\mid c)^{n_{wd}}$

or display-style

\[   P(c\mid d) = P(c) \prod_{w\in d} P(w\mid c)^{n_{wd}} \]


And here again with \verb!\mathcal!:

\[ \mathcal{P}(c\mid d) = \mathcal{P}(c) \prod\nolimits_{w\in d} \mathcal{P}(w\mid c)^{n_{wd}} \]


\end{document}

enter image description here

  • The only problem I have here is that the characters w \in d should be to the right of \prod. Can that be done? – Mr Morgan Dec 30 '15 at 21:41
  • Yes, using \textstyle, but this looks weird, \prod\nolimits is better – user31729 Dec 30 '15 at 21:45
  • @Mico: Yes, thanks. Forgot about that \nolimits – user31729 Dec 30 '15 at 21:49
  • I guess the math style complainers will come anyway ;-) The code works -- contrary to the version by the O.P. ;-) – user31729 Dec 30 '15 at 21:50
  • 1
    @MrMorgan When the product sign is in display math mode, it is customary to place the condition below it, for better clarity; when the formula is inline, the condition is placed to the side. – egreg Dec 30 '15 at 21:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.