I am writing a book-length text using LaTeX. I sometimes find difficulty in finding/understanding the various errors when compiling. I am using Emacs/AUCTeX. Is there a way of modifying emacs to make debugging easier?

  • 1
    I can't understand what you're asking. AUCTeX provides both information from the log and, occasionally, a more descriptive help message. Do you want something moreeven informative?
    – giordano
    Feb 15, 2016 at 22:52
  • Is this a problem with included files? You may want to run latex with the option -file-line-error. If that's not to the point, please clarify what you are asking.
    – jon
    Feb 15, 2016 at 23:00
  • I think OP wants a "condensed" log message to be displayed, i.e. with only errors & warnings, and the corresponding lines. If this is the case, then this question should probably be marked as a duplicate of this one.
    – Clément
    Feb 16, 2016 at 2:51

1 Answer 1


What you can do is to use the compilation from emacs with M-x compile. Then you can write the command you want to use, for example pdflatex doc.tex.

A new buffer will open: *compilation* in this buffer you can use tab to go to the next warning/error which indicate the line where the problem occurs.

by hitting enter, you'll open a buffer where the error occurs at the correct line. So you have two buffer open, one with your (La)TeX file and the other with the log:

enter image description here

  • What's the difference with compiling with AUCTeX, which, in addition, provides more descriptive information for common errors and warnings not available elsewhere?
    – giordano
    Feb 16, 2016 at 7:56
  • @giordano I do not use AUCTeX. This is why I presented this solution. Compiling with AUCTeX and following the path I presented should be a solution too Feb 16, 2016 at 7:59
  • If one really wants to manually type pdflatex doc.tex, lose forward/inverse search and the possibility to view a nice formatted list of error and warnings (in addition to the descriptive help messages already mentioned above), and stop at the first error encountered (so one has to compile n times to fix n errors, instead of compiling just once and spot errors all together), then probably yes, this is a solution too.
    – giordano
    Feb 17, 2016 at 8:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.