I just pretend the question contains questions:
- What is the warning concerning
titlesec
about?
- Why are my headers looking horrible?
1) The classicthesis
template uses scrreprt
with the option headinclude
and footinclude
, which are passed over to package typearea
.
Package classicthesis
defines the size of the typeblock, ensuring that package typearea
is loaded, but not taking into account the options passed to it. So you have to always add the options globally. Or use package geometry
to change the margins, which makes using the package classicthesis
pointless, as it only defines the style.
2) Opposed to it, the author of classicthesis
decided to tweak the appearance of sectional headings using package titlesec
, which in the meantime issues a quite prominent warning by KOMA-script, because it breaks some KOMA functionality.
You can (probably) silence the warnings, but that does not fix the fact, that classicthesis is in wide parts incompatible with KOMA-script.
A little example:
\documentclass[
% headinclude,footinclude,% option for tyearea
headings=optiontoheadandtoc
]{scrreprt}
\usepackage{blindtext}
\usepackage{classicthesis}% destroys head/toc mechanism using titlesec
\begin{document}
\pagestyle{headings}
\tableofcontents
\chapter[head={Walter Wombat}, tocentry={Gerry
Giraffe}]{Lyndon Lizard}% kicked by titlesec
\blindtext[10]
\end{document}
titlesec
is not compatible with KOMA too. I think, there are a lot of questions that deal with this issue and you've been told so already, as far as I can rememberclassicthesis
assumes the KOMA-optionheadinclude
andfootinclude
, else the header will be on the edge of the page.classicthesis
really just defines a bit of the optical appearance. All functionality, chapters, sections, referencing and citing, list generation etc. is basic LaTeX functiionality and available without any template.