0

This question already has an answer here:

I know two different ways to write the following:

enter image description here

We can either type $(a_{ij})_{\mathop{1\le i\le n}\limits_{1\le j\le n }}$ or, as shown here, $(a_{ij})_{\underset{1 \leq j \leq n}{1\le i\le n}}$. The output (the picture above) is the same in both cases. Notice that 1< j < n has a smaller size than 1 < i < n. I found this answer. So I typed $(a_{ij})_{\mathop{1\le i\le n}\limits_{\mbox{\tiny\(1\le j\le n\)}}}$. The result is pretty ugly:

enter image description here

Could you please tell me how to write it correctly?

marked as duplicate by Werner math-mode Mar 14 '16 at 17:01

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1

This would do the job :

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
$$(a_{ij})_{\substack{1\leq i\leq n\\1\leq j\leq n}}$$
\end{document}

Here is the result :

enter image description here

All lines have the same font-size.

Please note that with substack your number of line is not limited.

  • Yes it's working well. Thank you very much! – Scientifica Mar 14 '16 at 19:08

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.