7

Is there a way to add a vertical line (equal sign) to an augmented bmatrix (4x4) WITHOUT using array? Any help provided would be greatly appreciated.

  • Welcome to TeX.SE. Could you post some code, or at least a scan of a hand-drawn sketch of what you're looking to achieve? – Mico Mar 15 '16 at 21:31
  • @Mico: See the screenshot below from Steven, that is what I am trying to achieve but because I am using an application that does not support the use of array, I cannot use array to achieve it. – TechEng Mar 17 '16 at 14:25
9

No, you have to use array, because the amsmath matrix environments don't provide for specifying rules.

\left[\begin{array}{@{}ccc|c@{}}
1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\
1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\
1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\
1 & 2 & 3 & 4
\end{array}\right]

The trick for emulating bmatrix (or pmatrix) is having @{} at both ends.

  • Can you elaborate on what @{} means? – Eric Feb 15 '17 at 10:18
  • 1
    @Eric “Don't add the usual padding” – egreg Feb 15 '17 at 10:21
  • This still doesn't quite work for me. The one on the left uses bmatrix, the other {array}{@{}c@{}}. \hline seems to behave differently in the two cases – Eric Feb 15 '17 at 10:24
  • You actually want \left[\hskip -\arraycolsep ... \hskip -\arraycolsep\right], and to omit the @{} (determined by looking at amsmath.sty) – Eric Feb 15 '17 at 10:27
  • @Eric No, why should I? Do you doubt I know the code in amsmath? It's there in order to solve a very different problem. Of course, \hline was not requested. Otherwise, yes, the code like in amsmath can help. But that's partitioned matrices, there are questions about them on the site. – egreg Feb 15 '17 at 10:57
6

Here I use bmatrix, but have created \aug to be a vertical strut that can be placed between columns.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\newcommand\aug{\fboxsep=-\fboxrule\!\!\!\fbox{\strut}\!\!\!}
\begin{document}
\[
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 2 & 3 &\aug& 4 \\
1 & 2 & 3 &\aug& 4 \\
1 & 2 & 3 &\aug& 4 \\
1 & 2 & 3 &\aug& 4
\end{bmatrix}
\]
\end{document}

enter image description here

  • Thank you for responding but the application I am using does not support \aug either. There is not a complete and current list of the items supported by the application so I am going by trial and error. – TechEng Mar 17 '16 at 14:27
  • @TechEng Too bad. I gather you are unable to add LaTeX \newcommands to your existing application? – Steven B. Segletes Mar 17 '16 at 14:34
  • No, I am not. It is very limited. I can get the matrix using \begin{bmatrix} x & x & x & x\\ \end{bmartix}, I just have not found a way to add the vertical line. – TechEng Mar 18 '16 at 16:43
  • @TechEng, Could you use \def\aug instead of \newcommand\aug? – Steven B. Segletes Mar 18 '16 at 16:45
  • No, \def\aug does not work either. It is very limited in what will work. I can make it work graphically by adding an image on top but I was hoping to get the equation to work by itself. I appreciate your time. I will just keep trying other things. – TechEng Mar 21 '16 at 14:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.