For small letters a,b,c,d, we can put ~ on the top of these letters by

\tilde{a}, \tilde{b}, \tilde{c}, etc.

and they are clearly visible in the output. But, while putting them on Capital letters A,B,C,D, it is not so clearly visible in the output, i.e. by the commands

\tilde{A}, \tilde{B}, \tilde{C}, etc.

the symbol ~ on the top of these letters appears to be small compared to them. How can we enlarge it? or is there any other way to put sufficiently large ~ on the top of the Capital letters?


Type \widetilde{A}, \widetilde{B}, \widetilde{C}, etc. to get wider tilde symbols.

| improve this answer | |
  • Incidentally, \widetilde is available in both in LaTeX and PlainTeX. – Mico Apr 2 '16 at 7:15
  • Unfortunately, \widetilde{X} does not look nice to me. The tilde is very wide, and it also does not appear to be centered well. Currently looking for a nice alternative... – jhin May 5 at 11:11
  • @jhin - I'm afraid I cannot address your query meaningfully without knowing which math font you employ. Please provide more information about your document setup. – Mico May 5 at 11:28
  • 1
    @jhin - Speaking for myself here (obviously): I think the main problem is not with the \widetilde{X} but wih the use of ^T to denote (matrix) transposes. I'd use either ' ("prime") or a dedicated macro called, say, \transp (see, e.g., the definition below). \documentclass{article} \usepackage{stix2} \newcommand\transp{^{\scriptscriptstyle\top}\!} \begin{document} $\displaystyle (\widetilde{X}^T\widetilde{X})^{-1}\widetilde{X}^Ty \quad (\widetilde{X}\transp\widetilde{X})^{-1}\widetilde{X}\transp y \quad (\widetilde{X}'\widetilde{X})^{-1}\widetilde{X}'y $ \end{document} – Mico May 5 at 12:58
  • 1
    @jhin - For more information on the subject of transpose operators in a Latex document, please see What is the best symbol for vector/matrix transpose? Clearly, there is no consensus on what might be the "best" symbol. My recommendation: Make an informed choice and stick with it. :-) By the way, if you define \transp as a macro, you give yourself an easy path toward changing the appearance of the transpose operator should you ever feel a need to do so. – Mico May 5 at 13:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.