1

I have a rather large document with the following structure

\newenvironment{A}{sth.}{sth.}
\newenvironment{B}{sth.}{sth.}
\newenvironment{C}{sth.}{sth.}
\begin{A}
\begin{B}
\end{B}
\begin{C}
\end{C}
\begin{B}
\end{B}
\begin{C}
\end{C}
\end{A}
\begin{A}
\begin{B}
\end{B}
\begin{C}
\end{C}
\begin{B}
\end{B}
\begin{C}
\end{C}
\end{A}

Now I want to prevent the environments B and C to be separated, either on a column break or a page break. They always are paired such that after environment B always an environment C follows. One solution is to put both environments into one, i.e. instead of having \begin{B} \end{B} \begin{C} \end{C} I would have

\begin{D}
\end{D}

but I would prefer not to do this due to already having quite a lot of text written in that scheme. Another possibility would be to open a minipage in environment B, and close it in C, but that results in ! LaTeX Error: \begin{minipage} on input line 21 ended by \end{C}. Is there another solution for that? Or should I rather rewrite the whole document?

1
  • It seems like this shouldn't be too hard with a find-replace: Find \begin{B}, replace \begin{D}, find \end{C}, replace \end{D}, find \end{B}\n\begin{C}, replace ''
    – darthbith
    Commented Apr 2, 2016 at 16:19

1 Answer 1

2

Here is an idea.

First, the originale definition of A, B and C saved in A, BB and Cc

\newenvironment{A}{sth.}{sth.}
\newenvironment{BB}{sth.}{sth.}
\newenvironment{CC}{sth.}{sth.}

Then new environment B and C to keep BB and CC in same box.

\newsavebox\BC
\newenvironment{B}{%
\global\setbox\BC\vbox\bgroup\begin{BB}}{%
\par\xdef\mtprevdepth{\the\prevdepth}
\end{BB}\egroup}
\newenvironment{C}{%
\setbox\BC\vbox\bgroup\unvbox\BC\prevdepth\mtprevdepth\begin{CC}}{%
\end{CC}\egroup\box\BC}

Update: here is another idea using etoolbox package

\usepackage{etoolbox}

\newenvironment{A}{\textbf{A}sth.}{sth.}
\newenvironment{B}{\textbf{B}sth.}{sth.}
\newenvironment{C}{\textbf{C}sth.}{sth.}

\BeforeBeginEnvironment{B}{\begin{minipage}{\linewidth}}
\AfterEndEnvironment{C}{\end{minipage}}
1
  • Using the etoolbox-version was what I am looking for, due to already using other commands in this context (btw., I could have thought about that, too...)
    – arc_lupus
    Commented Apr 2, 2016 at 20:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .