I work on a big XeLaTeX document and encountered a rendering bug(?) with my MiKTeX installation (all packages are updated as per April 10, 2016). Here is a minimal example:


    \[ \mathtt{z} \]
    \[ \text{$z$} \]
    \[ \mathtt{z} \]

I'd expect first and third line to be the same. However, it's not the case:

MiKTeX rendering result

I asked my friend to render same file on Linux with TeXLive-2014, and here is what he got:

TeXLive rendering result

However, if I move \usepackage{mathtools} right after \DeclareSymbolFont's line, everything works on my system as expected:

Fixed MiKTeX render

Moving it in between \usepackage{unicode-math} and \DeclareSymbolFont does nothing.

I'm not sure whether it's a bug or incorrect usage of either package. Unfortunately, I do not really understand what \DeclareSymbolFont does - it was written by another person. What is going on here?

UPD: looks like it's not MiKTeX-specific problem and happens on TeXLie 15 as well.

  • \usepackage{unicode-math} should go after all other math packages, as recommended in it's documentation. – Lapshin Dmitry Apr 10 '16 at 16:26
  • 2
    It is not a problem specific to miktex. I see it with texlive 15 too. The problem is that when mathtools is detected unicode-math issues a \newfam \g__um_empty_fam and disturbs the family detection, but I can't look deeper now. – Ulrike Fischer Apr 10 '16 at 16:49
  • imho it is a bug github.com/wspr/unicode-math/issues/345 – Ulrike Fischer Apr 10 '16 at 21:34

This problem arose again here: Incompatibility with mathtools and unicode-math in xelatex?, and a patch is to be found in my answer.

A pull request has been made on the unicode-math developer site, to fix the issue which had been reported there by @UlrikeFischer.


It does not happen with:


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.