4
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[hmargin=1in,vmargin=1in]{geometry}
\usepackage{amsmath,cancel,color,mathrsfs}
\begin{document}
Derivation of $ \mathscr {L} \{\int_0^{t} f(\tau)\,d\tau\} $

\end{document}

So far this is what I have but I'd like to use \displaystyle for the integral to make it look nicer since the top and bottom limits are kinda squished, but then the Laplace part is too small and I have no idea how to make it bigger

Any help is appreciated

3

You could load the relsize package and use the \mathlarger macro (once or repeatedly) to enlarge \mathscr{L}. In the third row of the following screenshot, the enlarged \mathscr{L} is generated by two calls to \mathlarger; don't overdo the enlarging stuff.

enter image description here

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{mathrsfs,relsize,array}
\newcommand\Laplace{\mathlarger{\mathlarger{\mathscr{L}}}}
\begin{document}

$\begin{array}{>{$}l<{$} c}
original form & 
\mathscr {L} \{\int_0^{t} f(\tau)\,d\tau\} \\[2ex]
displaystyle & 
\mathscr{L} \biggl\{\displaystyle\int_0^{t} \! f(\tau)\,d\tau\biggr\} \\[4ex]
enlarged $\mathscr{L}$, displaystyle & 
\Laplace \biggl\{\displaystyle\int_0^{t} \! f(\tau)\,d\tau\biggr\} \\
\end{array}$

\end{document}
| improve this answer | |
  • The packages geometry, amsmath, and cancel are not necessary. – Svend Tveskæg Apr 11 '16 at 5:33
  • @SvendTveskæg - I've simplified the preamble per your suggestion. – Mico Apr 11 '16 at 6:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.