2

I need to create some dynamic name macro and I want to create them from a coma separated list of parameter in #1 in one loop. foreach is not the solution because it forces the use of gdef and I want only edef.

What would be an alternative solution ?

\makeatletter
\newcommand{\NewPoints}[1]{%
    \foreach \i in {#1} {%
    \expandafter\xdef\csname \i\endcsname{%
        a-\NumNode-\theLittNode}
    \stepcounter{LittNode}
    }
}
\makeatother

Is not suitable because of xdef global definition.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tikz} 
\usetikzlibrary{quotes}

\makeatletter
\newcommand{\NewPoints}[1]{%
    \expandafter\edef\csname #1\endcsname{%
        a-\NumNode-\theLittNode}
    \stepcounter{LittNode}
}
\makeatother

% counter for naming nodes
\newcounter{LittNode}

% level of calling
\pgfmathtruncatemacro{\NumNode}{0}

% node named #1 at the current level
\def\N#1{a-\NumNode-#1}

% Pass the created nodes back to the calling macro
\newcommand{\KeepUsefullNodes}{%
    \edef\Sortie{\csname OutPut-\NumNode \endcsname}
    \foreach \Nd [count=\i from 1]
        in \Sortie {%
        \coordinate (\Nd) at (\N{\i}) ;
        % debbuging
        %\node at (2*\NumNode,\i/2) {\Nd -- \N{\i}} ;
    }
    \pgfmathtruncatemacro{\NumNode}{\NumNode-1}
}

% one level up at the begining of a macro
\newcommand{\AtBeginTikzMacro}[1]{%
    \pgfmathtruncatemacro{\NumNodep}{\NumNode}
    \pgfmathtruncatemacro{\NumNode}{\NumNode+1}
    \expandafter\xdef\csname OutPut-\NumNode\endcsname{#1}
    \setcounter{LittNode}{1}
}


%-----------------------------------------------------------
\def\tr[#1](#2,#3,#4){\draw[#1] (#2) -- (#3) -- (#4) --cycle;}
\def\drawpoints(#1){%
\foreach \pt in {#1} {\fill (\pt) circle (2 pt);}}
\def\labelpoints(#1){%
\foreach \pt in {#1} {\path  coordinate["\pt" below] () at (\pt) ;}}
%-----------------------------------------------------------


%-------------------------------------------------------------
\def\Middles[#1](#2,#3,#4){
\AtBeginTikzMacro{#1}

\NewPoints{A}
\NewPoints{B}
\NewPoints{C}

% new level of nodes

\path[coordinate](barycentric cs:#2=1,#3=1) coordinate (\C);
\path[coordinate](barycentric cs:#2=1,#4=1) coordinate (\B);
\path[coordinate](barycentric cs:#3=1,#4=1) coordinate (\A);

\KeepUsefullNodes
}
%-------------------------------------------------------------

%-------------------------------------------------------------
\def\Medians[#1](#2,#3,#4){

% new level of nodes
\AtBeginTikzMacro{#1}

% human compatible node name
% In in the order of their output

\NewPoints{Gravite}
\NewPoints{A}
\NewPoints{B}
\NewPoints{C}

\Middles[\A,\B,\C](#2,#3,#4)

\tr[blue](\A,\B,\C)

\path[coordinate](barycentric cs:\A=1,\B=1,\C=1) coordinate (\Gravite);
\draw[green] (#2)--(\A) (#3)--(\B) (#4)--(\C);

\KeepUsefullNodes
}
%-------------------------------------------------------------

\begin{document}

\begin{tikzpicture}

\path    coordinate (a) at (0,1)
 coordinate (b) at (5,2)
 coordinate (c) at (1,6);
\tr[red](a,b,c)

% as final use
% we take the three middles with human names
%\Middles[I,J,K](a,b,c)
%\tr[blue](I,J,K)

\Medians[G,I,J,K](a,b,c)
\tr[blue](I,J,K)
\drawpoints(G)
\labelpoints(G)

\end{tikzpicture}

\end{document}
5
  • Do you need \edef but can't use \xdef?
    – Manuel
    May 5, 2016 at 13:12
  • Where should this be used? I see no \foreach used for defining macros.
    – egreg
    May 5, 2016 at 13:19
  • @egreg in \Newpoints macro to declare all macros at one. \xdef seams to work.
    – Tarass
    May 5, 2016 at 13:32
  • @egreg I edit my question with not suitable Manuel's answer due to global definition issue. Then you can see where I thought to use a foreach.
    – Tarass
    May 5, 2016 at 14:31
  • @Manuel in fact, I didn't read your question : exactly I need \edef and can't use \gdef.
    – Tarass
    May 5, 2016 at 16:33

1 Answer 1

1

The best alternative is of course expl3:

\usepackage{xparse}

\ExplSyntaxOn
\NewDocumentCommand{\NewPoints}{m}
 {
  \clist_map_inline:nn { #1 }
   {
    \cs_set:cpx { ##1 } { a-\NumNode-\theLittNode }
    \stepcounter{LittNode}
   }
 }
\ExplSyntaxOff

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .