I would like to make an inner-product symbol for my math paper. I would like it to work along the lines of \frac{arg1}{arg2}. Specifically, I would like to make a function, so that I could say


and get something that looked like

\langle arg1, arg2 \rangle. If someone could guide me through how to do this, it would be appreciated.

  • What I do is add \let\<\langle and \let\>\rangle to my preamble and then use \<a,b\> in the document. Alternatively, you could use something like\def\<#1,#2>{\langle #1,\,#2\rangle} and then \<a,b>. – user30471 May 11 '16 at 7:44

Using mathtools you can make a definition that allows resizing of the brackets when necessary.

Sample output



\DeclarePairedDelimiterX{\inp}[2]{\langle}{\rangle}{#1, #2}


\( \inp{\mathbf u}{\mathbf v} \)

  \inp*{\frac1n\mathbf u}{\frac 2n\mathbf v} =
  \inp[\Big]{\frac1n\mathbf u}{\frac 2n\mathbf v}


In this version \inp just prints standard sized brackets and \inp* uses \left...\right to scale the brackets to enclose the material. Often \inp* will produce brackets that are too big, and manual scaling can be provided by \inp[\big], \inp[\Big], \inp[\bigg], \inp[\Bigg] etc.

\newcommand\inner[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}
  • Thank you so much. Does this work to create any function, like these? – 9301293 May 11 '16 at 7:44
  • @phatty Yes. You may read section 6.1.1 of The Not So Short Introduction to LATEX 2e. – Paul Gaborit May 11 '16 at 8:36
  • Nte that this has the defect of not being able to scale the fences if you ever need to. – daleif May 11 '16 at 8:51
  • 2
    @daleif You can always add \left and \right before \langle and \rangle, respectively, to get automatic scaling – Daniel May 4 '17 at 17:08
  • @Daniel which, of course, is a very bad idea. Too many cases where they scale too much. – daleif May 4 '17 at 17:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.