2

I'm trying to make a block of equations where the first two are standalone equations, and the second two are subequations, ie

X=XXXX (1)

X=XXXX (2)

X=XXXX (3a)

=XXXX (3b)

I'm using the amsmath package, with align and subequation, but I can't figure out how to do this without making a separate block for Eqs 1-2 and one for Eqs 3a-3b. That solution is unsatisfactory, because then there is a big vertical gap between the two blocks, and I want them to appear all as one.

Here's the code I have so far, in case it's unclear.

\begin{align}
T(x) &= \frac{m}{2{k_{B}}} \left\langle \mathbf{\tilde{v}}{(\mathbf{x}_{i},t)}^{2} \right\rangle\\ 
\mathbf{u}(x) &= \left\langle \mathbf{v}_{i}(\mathbf{x}_{i},t) \right\rangle
\end{align}
\begin{subequations} 
\begin{align}
P_{xy}(x) &= \frac{1}{A} \left\langle \sum\limits_{i} {m \tilde{v}_{i,x} \tilde{v}_{i,y}} + \frac{1}{2} \sum\limits_{i} {\sum\limits_{j\ne i} {r_{ij,y} F_{ij,x}}} \right\rangle \\
\begin{split}
 &=\frac{m}{A} \Bigg\langle \sum\limits_{i}{{{{\tilde{v}}}_{i,x}}{{{\tilde{v}}}_{i,y}}} + \frac{a^3\omega _{pd}^2}{4} \\
 &\quad \times \sum\limits_{i}{\sum\limits_{j\ne i}{r_{ij,y}{\left\{ \frac{e^{(-{{r}_{ij}}/\lambda )}}{{{r}_{ij}}}\left( \frac{1}{r_{ij}}+\frac{1}{\lambda} \right) \right\}_{x}}}} \Bigg\rangle
\end{split}
\end{align}
\end{subequations}

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

  • welcome to tex.sx. that's a thorny one. even worse would be "full" equations 1 and 3, and subequations 2a and 2b. no ready solution though. – barbara beeton Jun 6 '16 at 17:44
2

It's possible with a little manual work. With \startsubequation you fix the equation number and each \tagsubequation command will step the subcounter. Until you use \tagsubequation, the main equation number will not increase.

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{amsmath}

\makeatletter
\newcounter{manualsubequation}
\renewcommand{\themanualsubequation}{\alph{manualsubequation}}
\newcommand{\startsubequation}{%
  \setcounter{manualsubequation}{0}%
  \refstepcounter{equation}\ltx@label{manualsubeq\theequation}%
  \xdef\labelfor@subeq{manualsubeq\theequation}%
}
\newcommand{\tagsubequation}{%
  \stepcounter{manualsubequation}%
  \tag{\ref{\labelfor@subeq}\themanualsubequation}%
}
\let\subequationlabel\ltx@label
\makeatother


\begin{document}

\begin{align}
T(x) &=
  \frac{m}{2k_{B}} \biggl\langle \mathbf{\tilde{v}}(\mathbf{x}_{i},t)^{2} \biggl\rangle
\\ 
\mathbf{u}(x) &=
  \langle \mathbf{v}_{i}(\mathbf{x}_{i},t) \rangle
\\
\startsubequation\subequationlabel{eq:3}\tagsubequation\label{eq:3a}
P_{xy}(x) &=
   \frac{1}{A} \biggl\langle \sum_{i} m \tilde{v}_{i,x} \tilde{v}_{i,y} 
  +\frac{1}{2} \sum_{i} \sum_{j\ne i} r_{ij,y} F_{ij,x} \biggr\rangle
\\
\tagsubequation\label{eq:3b}
\begin{split}
&=
   \frac{m}{A} \biggl\langle \sum_{i}\tilde{v}_{i,x}\tilde{v}_{i,y}+\frac{a^3\omega_{pd}^2}{4}
 \\
&\quad \times \sum_{i}\sum_{j\ne i}r_{ij,y}\left\{ \frac{e^{(-r_{ij}/\lambda)}}{r_{ij}}
  \left( \frac{1}{r_{ij}}+\frac{1}{\lambda} \right) \right\}_{x} \biggr\rangle
\end{split}
\end{align}

Let's see the next number
\begin{equation}
a=b
\end{equation}

Also references: \eqref{eq:3}, \eqref{eq:3a} and \eqref{eq:3b}

\end{document}

enter image description here

You're using too many braces, in my opinion.

  • Wow, ok great! Thank you! Does there happen to be a way to label things so that I can reference Eq. 3, 3a, and 3b all separately, or is that something that I would have to just work around? – Zach Jun 7 '16 at 14:31
  • @Zach I added the relevant tricks. The label for the global number must go just after \startsubequation and use the specific command as shown. – egreg Jun 7 '16 at 14:43
  • Great, thank you so much for your help @egreg! – Zach Jun 7 '16 at 15:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.