7

If I write $\bar{X}$ or $\overline{X}$ the bar (or the rule) over X is smaller or longer than the width of X. Is there any way to adjust the width?

Thank you in advance.

MWE

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,mathtools}

\begin{document}

$\bar{X}$ $\overline{X}$

\end{document}
12

The slanting makes the correct length of the bar a little more complicate. The following example measures the width of an upright X and uses this for the length of the bar. The solution also works for different math styles:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,mathtools}

\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\Xbar}{}%
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\Xbar}{%
  \mathpalette\@Xbar{}%
}
\newcommand*{\@Xbar}[2]{%
  % #1: math style
  % #2: unused (empty)
  \sbox0{$#1\mathrm{X}\m@th$}%
  \sbox2{$#1X\m@th$}%
  \rlap{%
    \hbox to\wd2{%
      \hfill
      $\overline{%
        \vrule width 0pt height\ht0 %
        \kern\wd0 %
      }$%
    }%
  }%
  \copy2 %
}
\makeatother

\begin{document}

$\bar{X}$ $\overline{X}$

$\Xbar\scriptstyle\Xbar\scriptscriptstyle\Xbar$

\end{document}

Result

  • Just a question if I put \Xbar in chapter or section I get an error : – Haouam Jun 27 '16 at 21:58
  • Missing number, treated as zero. ... }\copy 2 }_{n_2}$}{18}{subsection.1.12.4} in tableofcontents – Haouam Jun 27 '16 at 21:58
  • 1
    @Haouam The macro was not robust and \protect was needed in front of \Xbar. The updated answer now uses \DeclareRobustCommand and \Xbar should work without an additional \protect. – Heiko Oberdiek Jun 28 '16 at 19:16
  • Thank you , I have not noticed the update, It works fine ! – Haouam Jun 29 '16 at 0:38
  • I was trying to reproduce the format in my statistics textbook, and this looks like it exactly (the \Xbar in the bottom left). Thank you! – Joshua Detwiler Apr 29 '18 at 2:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.