Which is the correct single quote to use to show a truncated year number? In the example below is it (first), (second) or (third)?


First: from '98 to '07 

Second: from `98 to `07 

Third: from \textquotesingle 98 to \textquotesingle 07


In the typographic rules, at least for Italian, it is not clear. I prefer (third) but it is not very "typographic", someone said.

  • What's the name of the effect or font of numbers that go outside, underneath, the text-line? – nilon Jun 23 '16 at 3:01
  • Subscript? BTW, which is the relationship with the question? – SiliconValley Jun 24 '16 at 3:39
  • I actually looked up truncated numbers that go below the line. The answer? In Graphic Design SE: georgia. The word "truncated" awakened this interest of mine. That's all. People writing numbers might find (it's just my hunch) this typography interesting. – nilon Jun 24 '16 at 4:15
  • 1
    Ah! Now understand. They are called old style figures. Check: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/41095/… – SiliconValley Jul 5 '16 at 7:28

Since it's an omission, the normal apostrophe ' should be used.

First: from '98 to '07 

However, some style manuals (such as the Oxford Style Manual) advocates not truncating a year in numerical form.

| improve this answer | |

As per Butterick's Practical Typography, it is called apostrophe and it should be curly, like a single closing quote.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.