I would like to index some text elements that may contain code, for example:

foo of type \code{bar}

where \code is something like \texttt. But when I stick this text into \index, the collation is different between code and normal text:

\index{foo of type \code{bar}}
\index{foo of type abc}
\index{foo of type unknown}

The collation is wrong, and to get the correct collation, I would need to say:

\index{foo of type bar@foo of type \code{bar}}
\index{foo of type abc@foo of type abc}
\index{foo of type unknown@foo of type unknown}

However, this is tedious to maintain.

Is it possible to write a single command that creates the stripped "bare" text for the collation? Ideally, something like:

\myindex{abc \code{def} ghi}

that becomes

\index{abc def ghi@abc \code{def} ghi}


It would be acceptable if the mechanism is only able to strip one particular command (such as \code above).

Small example to reproduce:






This collates incorrectly. I would like a macro I could use in place of \index that would produce the correct collation order "aba", "abb", "abc", "abd", "abe".

  • I don't understand this question? Can you give some compilable document to start this. – user31729 Jun 22 '16 at 19:26
  • @ChristianHupfer: I added a small example. – Kerrek SB Jun 22 '16 at 19:34

I am not sure this is a good way to do this but it seems to work for the minimal example posted. It attempts to solve only the restricted problem described i.e. where just one command is dealt with as described. In this case \code{} will be treated specially so that it does not affect the sorting, but only the format, of the entry.





sorted & formatted

  • For what purpose? You can allow an optional argument in the usual way i.e. \newcommand*\myindex[2][<default>]{.... and then turn all my #1 into #2 and use #1 in whatever way you wish in the definition of the command. – cfr Jun 24 '16 at 23:40
  • Never mind, yes, it works perfectly. Index options are part of some other package/class (memoir, to be specific), and it composes just fine. Thanks again! – Kerrek SB Jun 26 '16 at 14:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.