There is the package breqn
for automatically breaking long math equations. I have used it, but there are three problems that I am facing.
- First: How can I implement the "Drop Ladder Layout", described in the package documentation of
breqn
? - Second: How can I reach a ragged-right alignment of the rhs in the equation?
- Third: How can I implement a pagebreak within
breqn
?
Thanks, Peter
Here is the code containing the problems:
\documentclass[10pt, a5paper]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage[]{breqn}
\renewcommand\[{\begin{dmath}}
\renewcommand\]{\end{dmath}}
%\allowdisplaybreaks
%\interdisplaylinepenalty=0
\begin{document}
\[
P_{5 \text{,}\: avg\text{,}\: var1}\left(T_1\right)
= \left( \lambda _{DU}+\lambda _{DD} \right) \lambda _{DR}\,T_{1}
+\left( \left( -\frac{1}{2}\,\mu _{0}\,\lambda _{DD}-\frac{1}{3}\,{\lambda _{DD}}^{2} -\lambda _{DU}\,\lambda _{DD}-\frac{1}{4}\,\lambda _{DD}\,\mu _{DR}
-\frac{1}{5}\,{\lambda _{DU}}^{2}-\frac{1}{6}\,\lambda _{DU}\,\mu _{DR}
-\frac{1}{7}\,\mu _{LT}\,\lambda _{DU} \right) \lambda _{DR}
-\left( \frac{1}{8}\,\lambda _{DU}+\frac{1}{9}\,\lambda _{DD} \right) {\lambda _{DR}}^{2} \right) {T_{1}}^{2}
+ \left( \left( \frac{1}{10}\,\lambda _{DD}\,{\mu _{0}}^{2}+\frac{1}{20}\,\mu _{0}\,{\lambda _{DD}}^{2}
+\frac{1}{30}\,\mu _{0}\,\lambda _{DU}\,\lambda _{DD}+\frac{1}{40}\,{\lambda _{DD}}^{3}
+\frac{1}{50}\,\lambda _{DU}\,{\lambda _{DD}}^{2}+\,\frac{1}{60}\,{\lambda _{DD}}^{2}\,\mu _{DR}
+\frac{1}{70}\,{\lambda _{DU}}^{2}\,\lambda _{DD}+\frac{1}{80}\,\lambda _{DU}\,\lambda _{DD}\,\mu _{DR}
+\frac{1}{90}\,\lambda _{DD}\,\mu _{LT}\,\lambda _{DU}+\frac{1}{100}\,\lambda _{DD}\,{\mu _{DR}}^{2}
+\frac{1}{110}\,{\lambda _{DU}}^{3}+\frac{1}{120}\,{\lambda _{DU}}^{2}\,\mu _{DR}
+\frac{1}{130}\,\mu _{LT}\,{\lambda _{DU}}^{2}+\frac{1}{140}\,\lambda _{DU}\,{\mu _{DR}}^{2}
+\frac{1}{150}\,{\mu _{LT}}^{2}\,\lambda _{DU} \right) \lambda _{DR}
+\left( \frac{1}{160}\,\lambda _{DD}\,\mu _{0}+\frac{1}{170}\,{\lambda _{DD}}^{2}
+\frac{1}{180}\,\lambda _{DU}\,\lambda _{DD}+\frac{1}{190}\,\lambda _{DD}\,\mu _{DR}
+\frac{1}{200}\,{\lambda _{DU}}^{2}+\frac{1}{210}\,\lambda _{DU}\,\mu _{DR}
+\frac{1}{220}\,\mu _{LT}\,\lambda _{DU} \right) {\lambda _{DR}}^{2}
+\left(\frac{1}{230}\, \lambda _{DU}+\frac{1}{240}\,\lambda _{DD}\right) {\lambda _{DR}}^{3} \right) {T_{1}}^{3} \text{.}
\]
\end{document}
\left
and\right
; also\,
is abused and, as I already commented,{\lambda_{DD}}^2
is absurd.