# How to remove caption and reduce space between figure and text

I try to reduce the space between a figure and text (bottom). my figure has no caption, if I make a caption for it the space is reasonable but when I empty that caption, \caption*{} to avoid increasing the number of figures, the space doesn't change and it seems I have a blank caption that seems like an extra space. However, if I entirely remove the caption part, the space is acceptable! How can I solve it?

\begin{figure*}[h]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.7\linewidth]{images/fig3-1}
\caption*{}
\setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{-10pt}
\label{fig3-1}
\end{figure*}

• Not sure I understand your setup fully. If your figure environment has no (and apparently needs no) caption, why do you provide a \caption* directive? By the way, is your document in two-column format? If it's not, you don't need the * ("star") in figure*. – Mico Jul 11 '16 at 4:44
• @Mico it is in one column format, Actually I tried to use \ref{xx} to refer to my figures, but I am still afraid there are some manual reference to the figures so skiping a figure number makes problem. but you are right – Ahmad Jul 11 '16 at 4:46
• If you need to cross-reference the entity via the \label-\ref mechanism, you need a caption. If you don't use this mechanism, you should probably ask yourself what the purpose of the caption may be. – Mico Jul 11 '16 at 4:53
• You can always \refstepcounter{figure}\label{fig3-1} but someone might wonder where the missing caption went. You could create a new float type so as not to confuse the captionless pseudo-figures from the captioned figures. If you don't intend to float them, all you really need is a new counter. – John Kormylo Jul 11 '16 at 12:39
• if the figure is to be placed "here", it doesn't need a captiobn, and you want to decrease the space between it and the surrounding text, you really don't need to use a float. you can just put the \includegraphics command in between two paragraphs, using a center environment, or even treating it as an unnumbered equation, $...$ – barbara beeton Jul 13 '16 at 0:28