10

Several times already I wanted to express something like

  !
A = B

or

   n->0
X ------> oo

in a math environment. How do I achieve this?

On a related note: What is the correct term for this? Googling for ! and = unsurprisingly doesn't yield too many useful results.

2 Answers 2

10

In the code below, I create a new command, \mbeq (short for "must be equal"...), which is a "math relational" operator (same type as the "ordinary" equal sign). Using the \overset command in the definition of the \mbeq operator automatically makes the new command "inherit" the type of the second argument of the \overset command; hence, it's not necessarily to assign the type "mathrel" explicitly.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
 % "mbeq": must be equal
\newcommand{\mbeq}{\overset{!}{=}}
\begin{document}
$ a\mbeq b$, $x\xrightarrow{n\to 0}\infty$
\end{document}

enter image description here

Finally, I'm not aware of a commonly used term for the "must be equal" symbol (exclamation mark set over equality symbol). I searched detexify, and no predefined symbol came up.

1
  • 4
    As I said in another comment, the \mathrel here is redundant, because \overset usually guesses right. But +1 for suggesting a new command for it.
    – egreg
    Oct 21, 2011 at 23:42
10
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}

\begin{document}

\[ \overset{!}{=}\qquad x\xrightarrow{n\to 0}\infty \]

\end{document}

enter image description here

4
  • 3
    Rather than \stackrel I'd recommend \overset
    – egreg
    Oct 21, 2011 at 22:42
  • @egreg: right. I've edited my answer, thanks. Oct 21, 2011 at 22:52
  • @egreg: In this \case, there is no difference between the visual output of \stackrel and \overset. I guess the only motivation behind it is that it has an \underset counterpart which makes it more generic in terms of usage.
    – Werner
    Oct 21, 2011 at 22:58
  • 3
    @Werner That's a happy case. Try with \stackrel{!}{x} and you'll see the difference. Besides, \overset tries to guess the nature of the main symbol (relation or operation), so using the correct spacing; conversely, \stackrel always creates a relation.
    – egreg
    Oct 21, 2011 at 23:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .