To denote the interior of a set, I'd like to have a command \interior. Now, as one can learn from this post, one possibility is to use \mathring. This is a neat command, but it produces a circle that to my taste is too small for the purpose. Of course one can experiment with \overset{\circ}{...}, but this way I had difficulties getting satisfactory vertical and in particular horizontal positioning of the \circ. An example:

$\mathring{I}\ \mathring{J}\ \overset{\circ}{I}\ \overset{\circ}{J}$

yields alt text .

If one has a close look then one sees that the \circ over the J should be moved to the right more than the \circ over the J! Is there a way to obtain the same nice automatic positioning as with mathring?


You can use \accentset from the accents package:

$ \mathring{I}\ \mathring{J}\ \accentset{\circ}{I}\ \accentset{\circ}{J} $


  • Great, this is what I've always wanted. Thanks! – Hendrik Vogt Sep 19 '10 at 16:26

In the end I'm using an even larger circle than in Caramdir's great answer: accents sets the \circ in \scriptscriptstyle; I'm using \scriptstyle. To not affect the line spacing so much, I have the circle lowered and let it stick out a bit of the bounding box of the resulting accented character. (In print it looks nicer than on screen ...)

comparison of different circles

\fboxrule0.0001pt \fboxsep0pt
$\mathring{I}\ \accentset{\circ}{I}\ \interior{I}$ \fbox{$\interior{I}$}

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.