I am using biblatex to typeset my bibliography and attempting to use the nature
style. In the main text the citations appear correctly, and the bibliography entries are correctly formatted but the item number appears as 1.
instead of [1]
. How should I correct this?
I'm not sure if I haven't set the style correctly, or if another option somewhere is conflicting (I can't find one but I don't fully know where to look) or if there is a way to force it (again I've looked but can't figure it out).
The potentially relevant part of my preamble is:
\documentclass[12pt, a4paper, oneside]{matt}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{epstopdf}
\usepackage{gensymb}
\usepackage{siunitx}
\usepackage[table]{xcolor}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{acronym}
\usepackage[backend=bibtex,
citestyle=nature,
bibstyle=nature,
sorting=none,
firstinits=true,
doi=false,isbn=false,url=false,eprint=false]{biblatex}
\usepackage[font=footnotesize, labelfont=bf, hang]{caption}
\usepackage{subcaption}
\usepackage[export]{adjustbox}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{setspace}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{cleveref}
Is this actually a style difference between bibtex and biblatex? I see here that for the biblatex nature
style the format is 1.
whilst here for the bibtex nature
style the format is [1]
.
If so, how can I force my reference indices to appear as [1]
instead of 1.
in the bibliography?
Many thanks
.tex
file (it is missing the\begin{document}...\end{document}
bit ...); and it is not M as it contains quite some packages that don't have a bearing on the matter. – moewe Sep 30 '16 at 18:28