1

Okay, I have been fiddling with this for too long, hence I decided to ask for help. Here's the problem, I am working with a two-column layout and I have some lengthy equations which I would like to display gracefully. This is what I want:

|<some eq> = <first part of a lengthy eq>       |
|     <very lengthy second part of a lengthy eq>|
|<another eq> = <first part of a lengthy eq>    |
|     <very lengthy second part of a lengthy eq>|

The vertical bars denote the margins. So, an equation's first part left aligned and the second part right aligned. And while we're at it, I am also curious how to obtain a variant which aligns the '=' symbol:

|<some eq>    = <first part of a lengthy eq>    |
|     <very lengthy second part of a lengthy eq>|
|<another eq> = <first part of a lengthy eq>    |
|     <very lengthy second part of a lengthy eq>|

I fiddled around with most AMS math environments and also with mathtools' multlined environment. My last attempt was with flalign, but then the second part exceeds the margin as follows

|<some eq> = <first part of a lengthy eq>       |
|                                        <very lengthy second part of a lengthy eq>

Help is appreciated, for a hopefully not too hackish solution.

Less important follow-up question: how acquire the above with one vertically-centered equation number, and how to acquire it with equation numbers for both equations?

Update. In response to the request for a minimal working example. Well, at the moment I do not have it working, not in a simple manner nor in a complex manner. But not leave you empty handed, this is what I currently use:

\begin{align*}
&\begin{multlined}
    f_1 = -f_2 = a + a + a + a + a +\\
    b + b + b + b + b + b + b + b + b + b
\end{multlined}\\
&\begin{multlined}
    f_3 = f_4 = c + c + c + c + c +\\
    d + d + d + d + d + d + d + d + d + d
\end{multlined}
\end{align*}

The problem here is that the equations are centered. I want the first part of the multlined at the left margin and the second part of the multlined at the right margin.

  • Welcome to TeX.SX! Please help us help you and add a minimal working example (MWE) that illustrates your problem. Reproducing the problem and finding out what the issue is will be much easier when we see compilable code, starting with \documentclass{...} and ending with \end{document}. – ebosi Dec 2 '16 at 12:03
0

Combine flalign* with \mathllap:

\documentclass[ a4paper, twocolumn]{article}%
\usepackage[showframe]{geometry}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\usepackage{lipsum}
\begin{document}

\lipsum[1]
\begin{flalign}
  f_1 &= -f_2 = a + a + a + a + a +\\
  & &\mathllap{ b + b + b + b + b + b + b + b+ b }+ b& \\
  f_3& = f_4 = c + c + c + c + c +\\
  & & & \mathllap{d + d + d + d + d + d + d + d + d + d}
\end{flalign}

\lipsum[2-6]

\end{document}​ 

enter image description here

| improve this answer | |
  • Your answer is also fairly easily extended to the requested variant, so I picked your answer as solution. Two sidenotes: 1) I do not understand the '&' after the mathllap. 2) mathllap interferes with equation numbers, use \makebox[<width>][r]{<second part lengthy eq>} with sufficient <width> to display the equation number – Bart Dec 3 '16 at 11:05
  • Your answer is fairly easily extended to the requested aligned variant. (Hmm, why can't I edit my comments?) – Bart Dec 3 '16 at 11:30
  • @Bart: 1) It is to ensure the last alignment point in at the right margin of the column (due to the use of \mathllap, one & after is enough). 2) You're right. I hadn't tested with equation numbers. A simpler solution consists in writing the last character /symbol of the rightmost part of the equations outside of \mathllap in one of the lines. Please see my updated answer. – Bernard Dec 3 '16 at 12:55
0

Edit: Like the first equation below?

enter image description here

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{mathtools}

\usepackage{showframe}
\renewcommand*\ShowFrameColor{\color{red}}

\begin{document}
\begin{gather*}
\begin{multlined}[t][\linewidth]
    f_1 = -f_2 = a + a + a + a + a +\\
    b + b + b + b + b + b + b + b + b + b
\end{multlined}\\
\begin{multlined}[t][\linewidth]
    f_3 = f_4 = c + c + c + c + c +\\
    d + d + d + d + d + d + d + d + d + d
\end{multlined}
\end{gather*}
\end{document}
| improve this answer | |
  • Thanks, it works for the non-aligned variant I asked for, although I had to replace \textwidth with \columnwidth (or more generally with \linewidth). I was unable to get your solution working for the aligned variant I requested. – Bart Dec 3 '16 at 11:14
  • I transform my answer for two column article case. Equations are left and right aligned as you request :) – Zarko Dec 3 '16 at 11:24
0

With some user intervention for setting a proper maximum width of the bottom lines:

\documentclass[twocolumn]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}

\usepackage{kantlipsum}

\makeatletter
\newcommand{\rightbox}[2]{%
  \ifmeasuring@
    \mathmakebox[#1][r]{{}#2}%
  \else
    \mathmakebox[\ifcase\expandafter 2\maxcolumn@widths\fi][r]{{}#2}%
  \fi
}
\makeatother

\begin{document}

\kant*[1]
\begin{align*}
\begin{split}
f_1 &= -f_2 = a + a + a + a + a \\
&\rightbox{.8\columnwidth}{+ b + b + b + b + b + b + b + b + b + b}
\end{split} \\
\begin{split}
f_3+f_0 &= f_4 = c + c + c + c + c \\
&\rightbox{.8\columnwidth}{+ d + d + d + d + d + d + d + d + d + d}
\end{split}
\end{align*}
and the same with numbers
\begin{align}
\begin{split}
f_1 &= -f_2 = a + a + a + a + a \\
&\rightbox{.7\columnwidth}{+ b + b + b + b + b + b + b + b + b + b}
\end{split} \\
\begin{split}
f_3+f_0 &= f_4 = c + c + c + c + c \\
&\rightbox{.7\columnwidth}{+ d + d + d + d + d + d + d + d + d + d}
\end{split}
\end{align}
\kant[3-8]

\end{document}

enter image description here

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.