TeX Live comes with a helpful fragment package, subscript, the copyright notice of which runs as follows:

% Copyright 1999 Robin Fairbairns
% this fragment is distributed under the conditions of the LaTeX
% Project Public Licence -- see lppl.txt in the LaTeX distribution
% this fragment provides a command \textsubscript, which is
% shamelessly copied from the command \textsuperscript that's part of
% LaTeX
% the fragment may be used as a package in its own right, if so
% needed.

I may be wrong but LaTeX used not to have a \textsubscript analogous to standard \textsuperscript. But now the following document compiles under pdftex from TeX Live 2016:


However, upon compilation, the log file doesn't mention the subscript package. Nor does pdftex complain if \usepackage{subscript}, but, strangely enough, it does complain if \newcommand\textsubscript[1]{}. What is going on here? Has \textsubscript become a standard LaTeX command? Can I just stop requesting subscript from now on?

  • 2
    IIRC \textsubscript has been added (along with other stuff previously covered by the fixltx2e package) to the kernel in the 2015/01/01 release. – cgnieder Dec 18 '16 at 12:53
  • The \textsubscript command had been added to fixltx2e in 2005. – egreg Dec 18 '16 at 13:29

The \textsubscript command was for many years part of fixltx2e: code which the team felt should be in the kernel but for various reasons did not want to add. At the start of 2015, there was a policy change and the contents of fixltx2e were 'folded' into the kernel. (There is a mechanism to back this out if required.) As a result, any recent LaTeX provides \textsubscript.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.