I'm trying to build a simple replacements dictionary using a prop structure of replacements old=new. When I'm mapping through the prop, I don't find any replacements. When I'm not (i.e., hardcoding), I do. What's going on here?




\prop_put:Nnn \l_tmpa_prop {sean} {patrick}
\msg_term:n {resolving}

\tl_set:Nn \l_tmpa_tl {hello,~sean}
\prop_map_inline:Nn \l_tmpa_prop
  \tl_show:N \l_tmpa_tl
  \tl_show:n {#1}
  \tl_if_in:VnTF \l_tmpa_tl {#1}
    { \msg_term:n {`#1'~found~in~`\l_tmpa_tl'} }
    { \msg_term:n {`#1'~not~found~in~`\l_tmpa_tl'} }

\msg_term:n {contrived}
\tl_show:N \l_tmpa_tl
\tl_show:n {sean}
\tl_if_in:VnTF \l_tmpa_tl {sean}
  { \msg_term:n {oh,~yes~it~is!} }
  { \msg_term:n {nope} }




* resolving
> \l_tmpa_tl=hello, sean.
<recently read> }

l.18     }

> sean.
<recently read> }

l.18     }

* `sean' not found in `hello, sean'
* contrived
> \l_tmpa_tl=hello, sean.
<recently read> }

l.21     \tl_show:N \l_tmpa_tl

> sean.
<recently read> }

l.22     \tl_show:n {sean}

* oh, yes it is!
  • Are you sure that \l_tmpa_tl is still the same you expect it to be? And shouldn't it be \tl_if_in:VnTF {#2} ...? – user31729 Jan 7 '17 at 16:31
  • @ChristianHupfer See the contrived example; it certainly looks to me like each piece of state is the same. – Sean Allred Jan 7 '17 at 16:33
  • @ChristianHupfer concerning #2 vs {#2}: no, I don't think so (though I did try that). It's my understanding that capital-letter arguments are given without braces (e.g. \tl_new:N \l_my_tl). – Sean Allred Jan 7 '17 at 16:42
  • Yes, I forgot about that convention – user31729 Jan 7 '17 at 16:43

What you are forgetting here is category codes: yes, the two token lists contain the same characters, but if you use \tl_show_analysis:N you can see that they have different catcodes. This is because keys are detokenized: as the documentation says

The ⟨keys⟩ are compared on a string basis, using the same method as \str_if_eq:nn.

(We could perhaps make it explicit that they are detokenized.)

If you want to replace the value in a prop by a new one, the correct approach is to use \prop_put:Nnn, which will as-described replace the stored value with a new one when the key is the same.

  • Note I'm not trying to replace values in a property list – I'm trying to replace values in a token list based on a property list. For example, a prop list of {{sean}={patrick}} will turn \l_tmpa_tl={hello,~sean} into {hello,~patrick}. I'll look into the catcode stuff :-) – Sean Allred Jan 7 '17 at 16:56
  • It sounds like a \str_if_in_p:nn fits the bill exactly, but sadly it does not exist (yet?) :-( – Sean Allred Jan 7 '17 at 16:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.