1

I use

\usepackage{amsmath}
\numberwithin{equation}{chapter}

It means when I make an equation. I just need to do this

\begin{equation}
    equation
\end{equation}

And it's numbered automatically.

So how can I cross-reference the equation numbered (1.2)? I don't \label it, so \ref is not helpful.

8
  • \ref{<equation label>}? for more, please provide minimal working example with only relevant packages.
    – Zarko
    Commented Jan 17, 2017 at 3:35
  • tyou proved only code sniped, not minimal working example :(
    – Zarko
    Commented Jan 17, 2017 at 3:46
  • Any particular reason for not wanting to use LaTeX's label-ref cross-referencing mechanism?
    – Mico
    Commented Jan 17, 2017 at 4:46
  • @Mico is this more convenient. Labeling everything is more complicated
    – T C
    Commented Jan 17, 2017 at 5:10
  • How inconvenient can it be to have to write \label{eq:second} and \ref{eq:second}? Is your paper really short? If so, just write "... as shown in equation (1.2) ..." and be done with it. I've edited the title of your posting to clarify your typesetting objective, which isn't really related to the directive \numberwithin{equation}{chapter}.
    – Mico
    Commented Jan 17, 2017 at 5:17

2 Answers 2

1
\documentclass{book}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\numberwithin{equation}{chapter}

\begin{document}
\chapter{first}
\begin{equation}\label{eq: my very first referenced equation}
    equation
\end{equation}
see \eqref{eq: my very first referenced equation} \dots
\end{document}

enter image description here

You need to run LaTeX at least twice.

Addendum: From comments to your question and changes of question follows, that you actually not interested referencing mechanism ... An alternative is using tags for numbering/tagging of equation and than referencing it manually:

\documentclass{book}
\usepackage{mathtools}% or amsmath ...

\begin{document}
\chapter{first}
\begin{equation}\tag{1.1}
    equation
\end{equation}
see (1.1) \dots
\end{document}

Result is the same as before.

0

If using \label and \ref (or \eqref) is too inconvenient for you, the leading alternative is to hard-code the cross-reference. E.g., if the equation of interest is numbered "(2.1)", you could write elsewhere

... as was shown in equation (2.1), ...

That said, you'll save yourself a lot of time and effort in the medium to long run if you learn how to use \label and \ref.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .