A while ago I asked how to extend minted to colour-highlight my chosen key words. The consensus was "make the changes in the external pygment program" -- so I did.

The changes are small and the output of my modified pygment program seems to be fine. If I install my new pygment module system-wide, my document compiles correctly and the changes to syntax highlighting are as expected.

The catch is I don't want to install my replacement pygment module system-wide, that's too invasive and I want to be able to distribute my document for compilation on other people's computers. I have a simple bash script bin/pygmentize.sh which invokes the new version of pygmentize as a set of local scripts. This bash script is a tested, functioning drop-in replacement for the global pygmentize program. Moreover, when it is invoked via latex/minted in the mannar shown below, it generates the correct markup, but the document fails to compile.

Here's a comparison of the markup that my altered pygmentize generates versus the original:


\PYG{c+cp}{\PYGZsh{}include} \PYG{c+cpf}{\PYGZlt{}stdio.h\PYGZgt{}}

\PYG{k+kt}{void} \PYG{n+nf}{main} \PYG{p}{()}
    \PYG{n+nf}{printf} \PYG{p}{(}\PYG{l+s}{\PYGZdq{}Hello, world!\PYGZdq{}}\PYG{p}{);}


\PYG{c+cp}{\PYGZsh{}include} \PYG{c+cpf}{\PYGZlt{}stdio.h\PYGZgt{}}

\PYG{k+kt}{void} \PYG{n+nf}{main} \PYG{p}{()}
    \PYG{n}{printf} \PYG{p}{(}\PYG{l+s}{\PYGZdq{}Hello, world!\PYGZdq{}}\PYG{p}{);}

This code was taken from the minted cache directory in both cases, it was generated through latex's invocation of pygmentize, not my own manual invocation. (I deleted the minted cache, switched to using my updated pygment, and ran pdflatex again.)

The only difference between the generated markup is that \PYG{n}{printf} becomes \PYG{n+nf}{printf} so I would expect that the rest of the document would compile the same way. Not so

! Undefined control sequence.
<argument> \PYG {c+cp}{\PYGZsh 
                               {}include} \PYG {c+cpf}{\PYGZlt {}stdio.h\PYG...
l.2 ...ude} \PYG{c+cpf}{\PYGZlt{}stdio.h\PYGZgt{}}

!  ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!

This error occurs when compiling the above piece of markup. If I am reading this correctly, it is the \PYGZsh command which is not recognised. This error strikes me as very odd -- minted is clearly loading and running, the earlier \PYG command was recognised as a control sequence, and the error manifests in a section of code which has not changed.

Here's how I got my altered pygmentize to be invoked: poking around in the minted source I saw this:

\ifcsname MintedPygmentize\endcsname\else

Then a little later

\MintedPygmentize\space -l #2 -f latex -P commandprefix=PYG -F tokenmerge (...etc)

It seems that by defining or redefining \MintedPygmentize I should be able to invoke a different program.

I tried doing this before importing minted

\newcommand{\MintedPygmentize}{bash bin/pygmentize.sh}

and I tried doing this after importing minted

\renewcommand{\MintedPygmentize}{bash bin/pygmentize.sh}

Either way round produces the error. I have confirmed that my bin/pygmentize.sh is invoked, and that it is receiving its inputs and producing its outputs.

I have concluded that redefining \MintedPygmentize has caused some black magic side effects.

So, in order to have a portably-compilable document, how do I tell the minted package to use my external script to generate the markup in a way that doesn't cause strange errors like this to appear?

  • bash bin/pygmentize.sh is wrong to begin with, because it would work only for documents in the parent directory of bin. Maybe bash \string~/bin/pygmentize.sh? – egreg Jan 31 '17 at 21:46
  • Nah, the script knows its place and handles paths correctly. – spraff Jan 31 '17 at 21:56
  • For what it’s worth you should not modify pygmentize itself (and that wasn’t the recommendation). Rather, you should write a plugin for Pygments (and that’s what David meant). Unfortunately I don’t know of a way to load Pygments plugins locally without installing them system-wide. So in the end it’s possible that your approach is the only working one. – Konrad Rudolph Feb 1 '17 at 17:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.