0

I'm using biblatex with numeric style. I think about referring this both sources

This shall be a MWE

\documentclass{scrartcl}
\usepackage[backend=biber,%
                        bibencoding=ascii,%
                        style=numeric,% 
                        natbib=true,%                                       Lädt das Kompatibilitätsmodul, welches Pseudonyme für die Befehle der Literaturverweisregeln des natbib-Pakets zur Verfügung stellt.
                        maxbibnames=3,%                                 Es werden maximal 5 Namen in der Bibliographie ausgegeben
                        sorting=nyt,%                                       Name, year, title
                        giveninits=true,%                               Vornamen werden abgekürzt
                        uniquename=init,%                           Einzigartige Namen werden abgekürzt
                        isbn=false,%                                        Isbn wird nicht ausgegeben
                        doi=false,%                                         doi wird nicht ausgegeben
                        clearlang=false,%                               weiß ich nicht
                        maxcitenames=3,%                                    in Zitationen erscheinen höchstens zwei Autoren
                        urldate=comp,%
                        defernumbers=true%
                        ]{biblatex}
\RequirePackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents*}{\jobname-bib.bib}

@misc{Kim_Barbulescu-2016,
        author = {Taechan Kim and Razvan Barbulescu},
        title = {Extended Tower Number Field Sieve: A New Complexity for the Medium Prime Case},
        howpublished = {Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2015/1027},
        year = {2016},
        url = {http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1027},
        urldate = {2017-03-20},
        keywords = {paper}
}
@Inbook{Kim_Barbulescu-2016b,
        author="Kim, Taechan and Barbulescu, Razvan",
        editor="Robshaw, Matthew and Katz, Jonathan",
        title="Extended Tower Number Field Sieve: A New Complexity for the Medium Prime Case",
        bookTitle="Advances in Cryptology -- CRYPTO 2016: 36th Annual International Cryptology Conference",
        year="2016",
        publisher="Springer Berlin Heidelberg",
        address="Berlin, Heidelberg",
        pages="543--571",
        isbn="978-3-662-53018-4",
        doi="10.1007/978-3-662-53018-4_20",
        url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53018-4_20",
        keywords = "paper"
}
\end{filecontents*}
\bibliography{\jobname-bib}
\begin{document}
\nocite{*}
\printbibliography[title={Paper}, heading=subbibliography, keyword=paper]
\end{document}

Since those are both the same releases, I would like to list them as different sources highlighted by [Xa] and [Xb] (where X is a natural number)

My first question: Would you refer to both publications? How can I reach my intention?

  • Are you using a numeric-family style? Can you maybe show us a real MWE of the rest of your bibliography setup. An answer will heavily depend on the way you obtain the bibliography. – moewe Mar 20 '17 at 14:40
  • 2
    But frankly, if they are the exact same paper I would not bother putting both in the bibliography, just cite the one you actually worked with. If they are different, I would prefer for the two two have different labels and not just 'sublabels'. You may want to have a look at the related functionality that biblatex offers. – moewe Mar 20 '17 at 14:42
  • @moewe I try to. But I guess I only will refer to the reviewed version. – Shalec Mar 20 '17 at 14:48
  • 1
    As it's one and the same paper, I would not cite different sources, but add eprint="http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1027" to the @Inbook entry. – user36296 Mar 20 '17 at 15:59
2

If you want both entries to appear in the bibliography, you can use @set

@set{kimburb,
  entryset = {Kim_Barbulescu-2016,Kim_Barbulescu-2016b},
}
@online{Kim_Barbulescu-2016,
  author       = {Taechan Kim and Razvan Barbulescu},
  title        = {Extended Tower Number Field Sieve: A New Complexity for the Medium Prime Case},
  howpublished = {Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2015/1027},
  year         = {2016},
  url          = {http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1027},
  urldate      = {2017-03-20},
}
@inproceedings{Kim_Barbulescu-2016b,
  author    = {Kim, Taechan and Barbulescu, Razvan},
  editor    = {Robshaw, Matthew and Katz, Jonathan},
  title     = {Extended Tower Number Field Sieve: A New Complexity for the Medium Prime Case},
  booktitle = {Advances in Cryptology -- CRYPTO 2016: 36th Annual International Cryptology Conference},
  year      = {2016},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin and Heidelberg},
  pages     = {543--571},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-662-53018-4_20},
}

This comes very close to what you had in mind if you use the subentry=true option of the numeric styles.

example of <code>@set</code> usage (with <code>subentry=true</code> in <code>numeric</code>)


But you could add Kim_Barbulescu-2016 as related entry in Kim_Barbulescu-2016b if you want:

@online{Kim_Barbulescu-2016,
  author       = {Taechan Kim and Razvan Barbulescu},
  title        = {Extended Tower Number Field Sieve: A New Complexity for the Medium Prime Case},
  howpublished = {Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2015/1027},
  year         = {2016},
  url          = {http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1027},
  urldate      = {2017-03-20},
}
@inproceedings{Kim_Barbulescu-2016b,
  author    = {Kim, Taechan and Barbulescu, Razvan},
  editor    = {Robshaw, Matthew and Katz, Jonathan},
  title     = {Extended Tower Number Field Sieve: A New Complexity for the Medium Prime Case},
  booktitle = {Advances in Cryptology -- CRYPTO 2016: 36th Annual International Cryptology Conference},
  year      = {2016},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin and Heidelberg},
  pages     = {543--571},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-662-53018-4_20},
  related   = {Kim_Barbulescu-2016},
}

example with <code>related</code>

  • Could you add a cite-example? will \cite{Kim_Barbulescu-2016} work, if I will chose method one (@set)? – Shalec Mar 20 '17 at 15:44
  • 2
    @Shalec Why don't you try it out yourself? \cite{Kim_Barbulescu-2016} will work, but you will have to \nocite{kimburb}/\cite{kimburb} the @set in order for the whole set to appear as in the picture and the citation to show with a/b. – moewe Mar 20 '17 at 15:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.