I am experimenting with the pre-defined glossary style in the glossaries package. The tree style looks great and seems flexible, but I would like the left edge of all the glossary entries to line up vertically down the page. As far as I can tell, that is what the alttree style is for.

But when I use alttree, the glossary entry name and description overlap. Is that expected behavior? I suspect that \glstreeindent is not indenting properly. If it is expected behavior, what am I doing wrong?




\newglossaryentry{gls1}{name={gls1},description={description for gls1}}
\newglossaryentry{gls2}{name={gls2},description={description for gls2}}
\newglossaryentry{gls3}{name={gls3longname},description={description for gls3}}


I have tried modifying the alttree style to add \hangindent\glstreeindent after the line \ifnum\@gls@prevlevel=0 (as per mfap's answer to this Two column glossary question) but there is no change in output.

(Tried to tag with [alttree] and [tree] but I don't have permissions yet.)


To set width manually: use \glssetwidest{} in the preamble. This command takes one argument and sets the name box width to the width of that argument.

To semi-automatically determine width: use \glsfindwidesttoplevelname in the preamble. This iterates over all glossaries (using \forallglossaries) and finds the widest parentless glossary entry name.

It can take an optional argument which is a list of glossary names to iterate over. For instance, \glsfindwidesttoplevelname[main,acronym] will find the widest parentless glossary entry name in the acronym and main glossaries only.

  • You can iterate through the gls entries with \forglsentries in order to determine the widest entry (see the glossaries documentation about \forglsentries – user31729 Apr 12 '17 at 16:03
  • Thanks, @ChristianHupfer. I had trouble using \forglsentries in this fashion, but it looks like \glsfindwidesttoplevelname basically does this anyway. Just what I needed. Do you want to make your suggestion and/or \glsfindwidesttoplovelname an answer? It is exactly what I was looking for with my question. – Natalie Weber Apr 17 '17 at 18:17
  • No, keep your answer or add your findings to it. – user31729 Apr 17 '17 at 20:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.