# How to label all pagenumbers to TOC in fancy footer?

I want to have a reference from everypage to the first page of the document. I think the link can exist well in the pagenumber of every page back to the TOC (first page here). Code

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{blindtext}
\usepackage{hyperref} % for links in TOC
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/56316/13173
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt} % Werner, remove top margin border

\begin{document}
\tableofcontents
\clearpage
\section{Beginning \jobname}
\blindtext[10]

\end{document}


OS: Debian 8.7

• Is it the header or the footer? – user31729 Apr 19 '17 at 18:49
• the operating system is never going to be relevant here. – David Carlisle Apr 19 '17 at 18:49
• @ChristianHupfer Footer. – Léo Léopold Hertz 준영 Apr 19 '17 at 18:49

Something like this?

A docstart\jobname hypertarget is placed right at the start of \begin{document} and another hypertarget anchor is placed as mytoc\jobname at \tableofconents.

In fancypagestyle{plain} the footer definitions use \hyperlink{docstart\jobname}{First page}} etc.

Please mind the\phantomsection in front of the \hypertarget command

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{blindtext}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{hyperref} % for links in TOC

\fancypagestyle{plain}{%
\fancyhf{}
}

\begin{document}

\phantomsection
\hypertarget{docstart\jobname}{}
\blindtext[10]
\phantomsection
\hypertarget{mytoc\jobname}{}
\tableofcontents
\clearpage

\pagestyle{plain}

\section{Beginning Foo}
\blindtext[10]

\end{document}


• I am thinknig here how to apply this approach when I have this macro in use: \usepackage{letltxmacro} \LetLtxMacro\oldincludepdf\includepdf \renewcommand{\includepdf}[4][]{% \oldincludepdf[pagecommand={‌​\thispagestyle{fancy‌​}},addtotoc={#4,section,1,#2,#3}, #1]{#2}}. It calls there fancy but how to apply the specific fancypagestyle is a question mark for me. – Léo Léopold Hertz 준영 Apr 19 '17 at 19:13
• @LéoLéopoldHertz준영: Yes, but that was not in your question, was it? ;-) – user31729 Apr 19 '17 at 19:15
• No. - - I minimalised it with the target in my last comment. :) Now, scratching my head, but waiting now for your other answer in the other thread, because I think it can help. – Léo Léopold Hertz 준영 Apr 19 '17 at 19:24
• I am trying to understand now the case better here after studying your proposal about key-value interface tex.stackexchange.com/q/365684/13173 – Léo Léopold Hertz 준영 Apr 20 '17 at 11:38