I was wondering if the following specification in 'nice nodes' can make an empty node -- that is the sister to F3 node in the example below -- look symmetric (not hanging down). Everything else (the distances between parents and siblings) could stay as specified below. I went through several solutions but haven't found anything that keeps parents fairly close together with nice (=symmetric) empty nodes. Thanks in advance for help.
\documentclass{standalone}
\usepackage{forest}
\forestset{
nice nodes/.style={
for tree={
inner sep=1pt, s sep=12pt,
fit=band,
},
},
default preamble=nice nodes,
}
\useforestlibrary{linguistics}
\forestapplylibrarydefaults{linguistics}
\begin{document}
\begin{forest}
[F$_4$P[F$_4$]
[F$_3$P, [F$_3$, fit=band]
[{} [A] [...] ]]]]]]
\end{forest}
\end{document}
(NOTE: The broader context for this question -- that is, why I simply don't go for nice empty nodes
is here: Forest for linguistics - proportional alignment like in qtree)