I want to know: how does \textit commands work? Does it use a different font (italic shaped font)? Or is it just a pure LaTeX command that changes text shape to italic?

My main problem: How to make a backward it-shaped text?

  • 1
    It uses a different font. As to left-handed writing, see tex.stackexchange.com/questions/245751/left-handed-writing. If you replace \ECFSkeetch with \itshape in my answer to that question, you will see backslanted italic. However, the proper way to do it is to design a left-slanted italic font, rather than left-slanting a right-slanted font design. – Steven B. Segletes May 17 '17 at 14:38
  • 1
    Yes, \itshape calls a different font. However, there is a function \slshape that slants the roman font text. The rightward slant is built in to the command, but I think some clever code can redefine the slant value. See this answer for how to employ FakeSlant when using XeLaTeX: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/128562/… – Steven B. Segletes May 17 '17 at 14:59
  • 2
    @StevenB.Segletes: no, wait, \slshape invokes a different font too. For example, cmsl for the Computer Modern meta-family. – GuM May 17 '17 at 15:02
  • 1
    @GustavoMezzetti Darn. Busted! – Steven B. Segletes May 17 '17 at 15:03
  • 1
    This question has an answer than might help explain the font situation: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/162622/… – Steven B. Segletes May 17 '17 at 15:07

Nothing I'd do, but, with XeLaTeX or LuaLaTeX,…




Some text \textit{in italic} and \textbackit{backwards tilted italic}


enter image description here

Your title question is easy to answer: \textit chooses a different font.

  • 4
    +1 Nice answer. Extreme ugly but nevertheless smart. ;-) – Schweinebacke May 17 '17 at 17:03
  • 2
    @Schweinebacke Somehow I find it not just ugly, but really disturbing on some deep aesthetic level. There are lots of ugly fonts out there, but this one is something else :). And of course +1 for answering the question... even at the price of unleashing that upon the world. – Pont May 17 '17 at 20:30
  • That it can be done does not mean that it should be done. I don't know which is the appropriate term, hideous or atrocious. Virtuous TeXing, however ;) – Raoul Kessels May 17 '17 at 21:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.