Is there any situation in which it would be easier to do things in LaTeX rather than XeLaTeX?


2 Answers 2

  • Process old documents.
  • Use old tools which are not compatible with Unicode.
  • For faster PSTricks.
  • Need PostScript output only.
  • Use some specials that XeTeX has not implemented. e.g. patterns and fadings library in TikZ. (Now latest SVN TikZ uses a new system layer to support patterns and fadings in XeTeX)
  • 2
    @Herbert: Martin wrote last month in c.t.t. that he has patched xetex.def to add clipping. The file is here (I haven't tested it yet) bitbucket.org/martin_scharrer/adjustbox/src/efbfe90f3968/xetex Commented Dec 6, 2011 at 8:49
  • @Herbert, Ulrike: The newest version is always under: bitbucket.org/martin_scharrer/adjustbox/src/tip/xetex/xetex.def. I already updated it a little since my c.t.t. post. Most of the technical implementation comes from Joseph Wright as part of his answer to my clipping question. Commented Dec 6, 2011 at 9:26
  • 1
    @Ulrike: sorry, but that is not important for me if there might be a file elsewhere. Important is only that what comes with the current TeX distribution and there is still an old xetex.def
    – user2478
    Commented Dec 6, 2011 at 10:10
  • 3
    @Herbert: I think it is very good that Martin has started to do something about the "mess" in xetex.def. He needs people who test the new def, and for this he needs that the news about patch are spread around a bit. Commented Dec 6, 2011 at 15:03

Xe(La)TeX exhibits the bug shown in this question, so if you are doing something that requires writing tabs to an output file, it is more difficult to use XeTeX.

I myself encountered this bug when using the externalize functionality of tikz, which writes a Makefile containing tabs. I find that the other features of XeTeX make up for having to hack around this bug, but if you aren't using those other features it is a pure annoyance.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .