1

I am trying to write the following equation but overfull \hbox will appear after running LaTeX to get a pdf. Could you please help me to write it in a proper way. Many thanks.

$$
(v_{-n}\dots v_{-1} \otimes v_{0} \otimes v_{1}\dots v_{m}) \dashv
(w_{-p}\dots w_{-1} \otimes w_{0} \otimes w_{1} \dots w_{q})\\
&=v_{-n}\dotsv_{-1} \otimes v_{0} \otimes v_{1} \dots v_{m}w_{-p}\dots
w_{q}
$$.
2

1 Answer 1

5

I recommend you use the amsmath package and \[\] instead of $$, as described here, or choose any other amsmath environments. I chose multline* for an environment since your & alignment was aligning to nothing.

\documentclass[12pt,oneside,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
\begin{document}

\begin{multline*}
(v_{-n}\dots v_{-1} \otimes v_{0} \otimes v_{1}\dots v_{m}) \mathbin\dashv (w_{-p}\dots w_{-1} \otimes w_{0} \otimes w_{1} \dots w_{q})\\
    =v_{-n}\dots v_{-1} \otimes v_{0} \otimes v_{1} \dots v_{m}w_{-p}\dots w_{q}
    \end{multline*}

\end{document}

enter image description here

Please mind that you had many typos in the code. Also, as @egreg points out, \dashv needs to be prefixed with \mathbin to yield a binary operator, with proper spacing

2
  • \dashv is defined in the kernel, but it's a relation symbol and it seems to be used here as a binary operation, so \mathbin\dashv
    – egreg
    Commented Jun 1, 2017 at 20:18
  • @egreg roger, I just thought it was a typo, only later realised it was real :) correcting it
    – Moriambar
    Commented Jun 1, 2017 at 20:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .