0

This is my preamble :

\documentclass[12pt,thmsa]{article}
\usepackage{natbib}
\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,amssymb,amsthm}
\usepackage{breqn}
\usepackage{rotating}
\usepackage{threeparttable}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage[para,multiple]{footmisc}
\usepackage{mathtools}

\begin{document}

First equation issue

\begin{flalign}
    {w_1} &= \left\{N_1(-d_+(S_{dt},dt)+N_2(d_+(S_{dt},dt)),-d_+(S_{2dt},dt);-\rho_{12})+N_3(d_+(S_{dt},dt),d_+(S_{2dt},2dt),-d_+(S_{3dt},3dt);\rho_{12},-\rho_{13},-\rho_{23})...\right\},
    \end{flalign}


\begin{flalign}
{w_2} &= \left\{N_1(-d_-(S_{dt},dt)+N_2(d_-(S_{dt},dt)),-d_-(S_{2dt},dt);-\rho_{12})+N_3(d_-(S_{dt},dt),d_-(S_{2dt},2dt),-d_-(S_{3dt},3dt);\rho_{12},-\rho_{13},-\rho_{23})+...\right\},
\end{flalign}

This looks like: enter image description here

My second equation troubling me:

\begin{align}
&\varepsilon {B_t} \left\{ {1 - {e^{ - \delta (T - t)}}N( - {d_ + }(\varepsilon {B_t},K,T - t)) - \delta \int\limits_t^T {{e^{ - \delta (s-t)}}N( - {d_ + }(\varepsilon {B_t},{B_s},s - t))\;ds} } \right\} \\
&= K \left\{ {1 - {e^{ - r(T - t)}}N( - {d_ - }(\varepsilon {B_t},K,T - t)) - r\int\limits_t^T {{e^{ - \delta (s-t)}}N( - {d_ - }(\varepsilon {B_t},{B_s},s - t))} {\kern 1pt} \;ds} \right\}.
\end{align}

This looks like this: enter image description here

My third equation:

\begin{align}
P_3 = &Xe^{-rT/3}N_1[-d_-(B_{T/3},T/3)]-S_{T/3}N_1[-d_+(B_{T/3},T/3)]\nonumber\\
&+Xe^{-2rT/3}N_2[d_-(B_{T/3},T/3), -d_-(B_{2T/3},2T/3); -1/\sqrt{2}]\nonumber\\
&-S_{T/3, 2T/3}N_2[d_+(B_{T/3}, T/3),-d_+(B_{2T/3},2T/3);-1/\sqrt{2}]\nonumber\\
&+Xe^{-rT}N_3[d_+(B_{T/3},T/3), -d_+(B_{2T/3},2T/3), -d_+(X,T);1/\sqrt{2},-1/\sqrt{3},-\sqrt{2/3}]\nonumber\\
&-S_{T/3, 2T/3}N_3[d_-(B_{T/3},T/3),d_-(B_{2T/3},2T/3),-d_-(X,T);1/\sqrt{2},-1/\sqrt{3},-\sqrt{2/3}],
\end{align}

This looks like it: enter image description here

3
  • 1
    What's the issue? That those equations are too long?
    – TeXnician
    Jun 4, 2017 at 15:12
  • they go way passed the equation numbering so it looks awful
    – asdf
    Jun 4, 2017 at 15:14
  • 3
    there is no automatic line breaking, You need to add \\ to break the equations at sensible places. Also please fix the above example so it is a single document people can run to see the issue. Jun 4, 2017 at 15:16

3 Answers 3

1

I can propose this, based on aligned or multlined environments, and the medium-sized formulae from nccmath. Note you don't have to load amsmath if you load mathtools:

\documentclass[12pt,thmsa]{article}
\usepackage{natbib}
\usepackage{amsfonts,amssymb,amsthm}
%\usepackage{breqn}
\usepackage{rotating}
\usepackage{threeparttable}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage[para,multiple]{footmisc}
\usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}
\usepackage[showframe]{geometry}

\begin{document}
\begin{align}
    w_1 &= \begin{multlined}[t]\Bigl\{N_1(-d_+(S_{dt},dt)+N_2(d_+(S_{dt},dt)),-d_+(S_{2dt},dt);-\rho_{12})\\[-1ex]
    +N_3(d_+(S_{dt},dt),d_+(S_{2dt},2dt),-d_+(S_{3dt},3dt);\rho_{12},-\rho_{13},-\rho_{23})...\Bigr\},\end{multlined}\\
{w_2} &= \begin{multlined}[t]\Bigl\{N_1(-d_-(S_{dt},dt)+N_2(d_-(S_{dt},dt)),-d_-(S_{2dt},dt);-\rho_{12})\\[-1ex]
+ N_3\bigl(d_-(S_{dt},dt),d_-(S_{2dt},2dt),-d_-(S_{3dt},3dt);\rho_{12},-\rho_{13},-\rho_{23}\bigr)+...\Bigr\}\end{multlined}
\end{align}
\vspace{1cm}
\begin{align}
\varepsilon {B_t}&\medmath{\Biggl\{ 1 - {e^{ - \delta (T - t)}}N\bigl( - {d_ + }(\varepsilon {B_t},K,T - t)\bigr) - \delta \int\limits_t^T e^{ - \delta (s-t)} N\bigl( -d_{+}(\varepsilon B_t, B_s, s - t)\bigr)\;ds \Biggr\}} \\
= K &\medmath{\Biggl\{ 1 - e^{ - r(T - t)}N\bigl( -d_{-}(\varepsilon B_t, K, T - t)\bigr) - r\int\limits_t^T e^{ - \delta (s-t)}N\bigl(-d_{-} (\varepsilon B_t, B_s, s - t)\bigr) \;ds \Biggr\}}.
\end{align}
\vspace{1cm}
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
P_3 &= {} Xe^{-rT/3}N_1\Bigl[-d_-\Bigl(B_{\tfrac{T}{3}},\mfrac{T}{3}\Bigr)\Bigr]-S_{T/3}N_1\Bigl[-d_+\Bigl(B_{\tfrac{T}{3}},\mfrac{T}{3}\Bigr)\Bigr] \\
&+Xe^{-2rT/3}N_2\Bigl[d_-\Bigl(B_{\tfrac{T}{3}},\mfrac{T}{3}\Bigr), -d_-\Bigl(B_{\tfrac{2T}{3}},\mfrac{2T}{3}\Bigr); -\mfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Bigr] \\
&-S_{\tfrac{T}{3}, \tfrac{2T}{3}} N_2\Bigl[d_+\Bigl(B_{\tfrac{T}{3}},\mfrac{T}{3}\Bigr),-d_+ \Bigl(B_{\tfrac{2T}{3}},\mfrac{2T}{3}\Bigr);-\mfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Bigr] \\
&+Xe^{-rT}N_3\Biggl[d_+\Bigl(B_{\tfrac{T}{3}},\mfrac{T}{3}\Bigr), -d_+\Bigl(B_{\tfrac{2T}{3}},\mfrac{2T}{3}\Bigr), -d_+(X,T);\mfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-\mfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}},-\sqrt{\mfrac{2}{3}}\Biggr] \\
&-S_{\tfrac{T}{3}, \tfrac{2T}{3}}N_3\Biggl[d_-\Bigl(B_{\tfrac{T}{3}}, \mfrac{T}{3}\Bigr),d_-(B_{2T/3}, 2T/3),-d_-(X,T);\mfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-\mfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}},-\sqrt{\mfrac{2}{3}}
\Biggr],
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}

\end{document}

enter image description here

2

Your equations are a bit too long. I tried and divided them in many rows. It's the best I could do, but please consider defining some longer pieces of the formulas as constants/letters, otherwise it's difficult to keep track and typeset it.

Oh, mind that the align environment is meant to align many equations at once with different numbers. What you want is probably split or multline

\documentclass[12pt,thmsa]{article}
\usepackage{natbib}
\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,amssymb,amsthm}
\usepackage{breqn}
\usepackage{rotating}
\usepackage{threeparttable}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage[para,multiple]{footmisc}
\usepackage{mathtools}

\begin{document}
\begin{multline}
 w_1 = \{N_1(-d_+(S_{dt},dt)+N_2(d_+(S_{dt},dt)),-d_+(S_{2dt},dt);-\rho_{12})\\
 +N_3(d_+(S_{dt},dt),d_+(S_{2dt},2dt),-d_+(S_{3dt},3dt);\rho_{12},-\rho_{13},-\rho_{23})\ldots\},
\end{multline}
\begin{multline}
{w_2} = \{N_1(-d_-(S_{dt},dt)+N_2(d_-(S_{dt},dt)),-d_-(S_{2dt},dt);-\rho_{12})\\
+N_3(d_-(S_{dt},dt),d_-(S_{2dt},2dt),-d_-(S_{3dt},3dt);\rho_{12},-\rho_{13},-\rho_{23})+\ldots\},
\end{multline}
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
&\varepsilon {B_t} \biggl\{ 1 - {e^{ - \delta (T - t)}}N( - {d_ + }(\varepsilon {B_t},K,T - t)) \\ &{}-\delta \int\limits_t^T {{e^{ - \delta (s-t)}}N( - {d_ + }(\varepsilon {B_t},{B_s},s - t))\;ds}  \biggr\} \\
&= K \biggl\{ 1 - {e^{ - r(T - t)}}N( - {d_ - }(\varepsilon {B_t},K,T - t)) \\
&{}- r\int\limits_t^T {{e^{ - \delta (s-t)}}N( - {d_ - }(\varepsilon {B_t},{B_s},s - t))} {\kern 1pt} \;ds \biggr\}.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
P_3 &= Xe^{-rT/3}N_1[-d_-(B_{T/3},T/3)]-S_{T/3}N_1[-d_+(B_{T/3},T/3)]\\
&{}+Xe^{-2rT/3}N_2[d_-(B_{T/3},T/3), -d_-(B_{2T/3},2T/3); -1/\sqrt{2}]\\
&{}-S_{T/3, 2T/3}N_2[d_+(B_{T/3}, T/3),-d_+(B_{2T/3},2T/3);-1/\sqrt{2}]\\
&{}+Xe^{-rT}N_3[d_+(B_{T/3},T/3), -d_+(B_{2T/3},2T/3),\\
&{} -d_+(X,T);1/\sqrt{2},-1/\sqrt{3},-\sqrt{2/3}]\\
&{}-S_{T/3, 2T/3}N_3[d_-(B_{T/3},T/3),\\
&d_-(B_{2T/3},2T/3),-d_-(X,T);1/\sqrt{2},-1/\sqrt{3},-\sqrt{2/3}],\\
\end{split}
\end{equation}
\end{document}

enter image description here

0

As Moriambar also says your equations are too long. I think you have the same problem in all the equation so I concentrated on the first. Here I first split after the first main - but even then the second row was too wide. I have tried to get the contents of paranthesis to align using \phantom. Still, it is not really readable, so if it is possible to find shorter expressions it would help.

\begin{flalign}
  {w_1} &= \Bigl\{N_1\Bigl(-d_+(S_{dt},dt)+N_2(d_+(S_{dt},dt)),-d_+(S_{2dt},dt);-\rho_{12}\Bigr)\nonumber\\
  &\phantom{{}={}\Bigl\{}
  +N_3\Bigl(d_+(S_{dt},dt),d_+(S_{2dt},2dt),\nonumber\\
  &\phantom{{}={}\Bigl\{{}+N_3\Bigl(}
  -d_+(S_{3dt},3dt);\rho_{12},-\rho_{13},-\rho_{23}\Bigr)\ldots\Bigr\},
\end{flalign}

enter image description here

In cases like this I think you should not use \left and \right. Instead use e.g. \Bigl and \Bigr defined in amsmath since they don't need to be in pair on the same row. There are many other sizes of them. Second, the alignment & should be before the = tio get spacing right. You can use \phantom to start on other points. Normally I try to have the equation number after the last row, which means supressing the others using \nonumber. (There is some other way to do it aslo but I forgot it right now).

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .