How can I left-align each cell in an equation containing math symbols?

As the title already indicates I have an equation which contains multiple cells and I want the content of each cell to be left aligned. Following this answer I tried used flalign however this seems to just left-align the overall equation. The following is a small example:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}

\begin{document}

\begin{flalign*}
\textrm{Some stuff about } \rho & & \\
\qquad \textrm{This is a really long equation and the following} \qquad & \textrm{should be left aligned} & \\
\qquad \textrm{Short equation (should be left too)}              \qquad & \textrm{but quite a long one on the right though} &
\end{flalign*}

\end{document}


This example produces the following output (I put some remarks to indicate what I would like to achieve):

After doing some research I got the feeling that either of these two approaches should do but I can't get it working.

Following the first approach I tried:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{calc}

\newcommand*{\mbc}[2]{\makebox[\widthof{$F(\alpha)$}][#1]{$#2$}}

\begin{document}

\begin{flalign*}
\mbc{l}{\textrm{Some stuff about } \rho} & & \\
\qquad \textrm{This is a really long equation and the following} \qquad & \textrm{should be left aligned} & \\
\qquad \textrm{Short equation (should be left too)}              \qquad & \textrm{but quite a long one on the right though} &
\end{flalign*}

\end{document}


Surprisingly the first line now seems to end up in the second cell (instead of being left aligned in the first cell):

The second approach doesn't seem to work with math symbols:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}

\newcommand{\pushleft}[1]{\ifmeasuring@#1\else\omit$\displaystyle#1$\hfill\fi\ignorespaces}

\begin{document}

\begin{flalign*}
\pushleft{\textrm{Some stuff about } \rho} & & \\
\qquad \textrm{This is a really long equation and the following} \qquad & \textrm{should be left aligned} & \\
\qquad \textrm{Short equation (should be left too)}              \qquad & \textrm{but quite a long one on the right though} &
\end{flalign*}

\end{document}


Gives the output:

$pdflatex test.tex [...] ! Undefined control sequence. \pushleft #1->\ifmeasuring @#1\else \omit$\displaystyle #1\hfill \fi \igno... l.20 \end{flalign*}  Inserting additional $$ doesn't help either. The closest I could get was by using \omit and \hfill however \omit seems to opt out of math mode so I need to insert additional $$: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{flalign*} \omit\textrm{Some stuff about } \rho$\hfill & & \\ \omit$\qquad \textrm{This is a really long equation and the following} \qquad\hfill & \textrm{should be left aligned} & \\ \omit\qquad \textrm{Short equation (should be left too)}              \qquad\hfill & \textrm{but quite a long one on the right though} & \end{flalign*} \end{document}  It works however my IDE is marking the extra  as errors all over the place which is definitely not pleasant. Also I'm not sure if this is a clean solution that will always work as expected. Does anybody have an idea how to achieve cell-wise left-alignment in an equation containing math symbols? Or any comments on the latter \omit-\hfill--approach? 1 Answer Like this? \documentclass{article} \usepackage{mathtools} \usepackage[showframe]{geometry} \begin{document} \begin{flalign*} & \textrm{Some stuff about } \rho & & \\ & \qquad \textrm{This is a really long equation and the following} && \textrm{should be left aligned} \\ & \qquad \textrm{Short equation (should be left too)} & & \textrm{but quite a long one on the right though} \end{flalign*} \end{document}  Example code for other alignments: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{mathtools} \usepackage[showframe]{geometry} \begin{document} \begin{flalign*} \shortintertext{\texttt{Columns left-aligned:} } & \textrm{Some stuff about } \rho \\ & \qquad \textrm{This is a really long equation and the following} && \textrm{should be left aligned} \\ & \qquad \textrm{Short equation (should be left too)} & & \textrm{but quite a long one on the right though} \end{flalign*} \begin{flalign*} \shortintertext{\texttt{Columns right-aligned:} } & \rlap{Some stuff about\rho \$} \\
& & \textrm{This is a really long equation and the following}& & \textrm{should be right aligned}& \\
& &\textrm{Short equation (should be rightt too)} && \textrm{but quite a long one on the right though}&
\end{flalign*}

\begin{flalign*}
\shortintertext{\texttt{Left column centred, right column left-aligned: }}
& \textrm{Some stuff about } \rho  \\
& \begin{gathered} \textrm{This is a really long equation and the following}\\\textrm{Short equation (should be centred)}\end{gathered}
& \begin{aligned} & \textrm{should be left aligned} \\
& \textrm{but quite a long one on the right though}\end{aligned}&
\end{flalign*}

\end{document}


• Yes, decent solution! Do you mind explaining why this works? Is it that - within align - even columns are right-aligned and odd columns are left-aligned and so we just omit the even ones? – a_guest Jul 6 '17 at 15:24
• No. People often misunderstand the syntax with &: actually k alignment points require 2k – 1 &: From the second column of alignment, a first & points out the beginning of a new column, and the second & points the exact alignment in that column. For the first column, it is not necessary to point out its beginning, whence the 2k – 1 ampersands. Here, in the first column, the alignment happens at the left margin, and using && means the beginning of the second column and its alignment point are at the same place. – Bernard Jul 6 '17 at 15:36
• How can I achieve centering or right-alignment then? Isn't that syntax ambiguous when it comes to those cases? Could you explain how I can achieve the first column to be centered and the second one to be left-aligned? – a_guest Jul 7 '17 at 8:24
• @a_guest: I added a code for these cases. Only the centred/left-aligned case requires a different syntax, using gathered and aligned. – Bernard Jul 7 '17 at 8:49
• Thanks! However I don't get the hang of the second example (right-alignment). The syntax is && 1st && 2nd &, so the first column is preceded by && while the second column is preceded by only & (the second ampersand indicating a new column) but includes a trailing &. Despite this difference the alignment in both columns is the same. Why is this? Also this examples uses five & for two alignment points which is not 2k-1 as you pointed out in your previous comment. I'd like to understand the align syntax so I can apply it to general cases. – a_guest Jul 7 '17 at 9:12