In the template of a Springer journal there is no numbering procedure specified for the equations and there is only following lines as an example of an equation:


This results in continuous numbering of equations. However, I've seen that in published papers of the same journal, the numbering restarts at each section.

Am I doing something wrong or it is the way it is supposed to be?

If numbering should restart at each section, how is that done?

  • Thanks to @luchonacho, [Here] (tex.stackexchange.com/questions/207532/…) is the answer to the second part of the question. However, I'd like to know if I should change the numbering or leave it be.
    – K. Ara
    Jul 20 '17 at 12:04
  • Is this not a matter of taste? If you are unsure, I would go for the one other papers in your field use. In any case, this is a very minor point, easy to correct in a future revision. So I would not bother very much with this.
    – luchonacho
    Jul 20 '17 at 12:06
  • In other papers numbering restarts too. So, I guess I'd just do that. Also, since I need that the number of sections to be included in equations number, this was very helpful.
    – K. Ara
    Jul 20 '17 at 12:26
  • If you want to publish in a journal, just use the journal class as it is or ask your editor. Things like numbering by section will usually be done by the editor/publisher. Jul 20 '17 at 12:55
  • @Schweinebacke -- not all publishers (i know you said "usually"). at ams, the author is usually considered to have decided on the appropriate numbering style, so it won't be changed unless there's a real error. Jul 20 '17 at 15:49

Answer for your question "If numbering should restart at each section, how is that done?" is


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.