How do I cite a translator as making an interpretative assumption? If I write
\cite{taylor}
, the name of the original author will appear, but I want the
name of the translator.
2 Answers
Please read Mico's comment first, the following answer just shows the technical possibility to do this
\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents*}{mybib.bib}
@book{aristotle:physics,
options = {useauthor=false,usetranslator=true},
author = {Aristotle},
title = {Physics},
date = 1929,
translator = {Wicksteed, P. H. and Cornford, F. M.},
publisher = {G. P. Putnam},
location = {New York},
keywords = {primary},
langid = {english},
langidopts = {variant=american},
shorttitle = {Physics},
annotation = {A \texttt{book} entry with a \texttt{translator} field},
}
\end{filecontents*}
\usepackage[backend=bibtex,giveninits=true,style=authoryear-ibid]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{mybib.bib}
\begin{document}
\cite{aristotle:physics}
\printbibliography
\end{document}
-
1usetranslator, neat, thanks. I wonder if this option can be used on a per citation basis as well. (Though in reality there may not be much use for that.)– ToothrotCommented Jul 21, 2017 at 11:24
-
@Toothrot Probably possible by declaring a new cite command. Search for
\DeclareCiteCommand
Commented Jul 21, 2017 at 11:47 -
2+1. Readers might find it a tad unusual to see the book entitled Physics be associated with a specific pair of English-language translators rather than with the piece's author (Aristotle). If it's really necessary to cite Mssrs. Wicksteed and Cornford, it surely must be because of some pertinent thoughts they expressed in, say, the "Translators' Preface" to Physics or in some footnote in which they expounded on some particular challenge to translating an expression from classical Greek to modern English. Using the
@incollection
entry type for their work might be the way to go here.– MicoCommented Jul 21, 2017 at 12:05
Other options using 'note' and 'annotation' fields are described here; BibTeX: citing both translation and the original
-
1
-
1Welcome to TeX.SE! Please explain your answer better. Suppose the given link is broken your answer at the moment is useless ... How does it solve the given issue?– MenschCommented Apr 4, 2019 at 4:43
author
field?\nocite
. Or maybe not, I'll think about it.biblatex
be an option for you?