# How to make text in math mode which would cause an overfull \hbox automatically start on the next line?

I have text within $s following normal text, which runs off the end of the line and creates an overfull \hbox warning. By default, LaTeX doesn't let the stuff in math mode run off the end of the line, but it creates a line break at a certain place in the code. How do I tell it to instead, by default, put a line break before the text in the $s starts?

\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}

Here is text which starts off the line.
We can write $A^n$ as $\bigcup_{a^{n-1} \in A^{n-1}} \{(a^{n-1}, a) \,:\, a \in A \}$.

More text, then I have something like the following
$(-3, 3)^{C} \textrm{ in } A = (-\infty, -3] \cup [3, \infty)$.

\end{document}


I'm getting line breaks after the : in the first sentence, and after the \cup in the second sentence.

P.S. Also, might there be a better way of creating a "such that" sign within a set written in math mode, instead of \,:\,? Ideally, a | would be nice, preceded by and following spaces...

\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}

Here is text which starts off the line.
We can write $A^n$ as
$\bigcup_{a^{n-1} \in A^{n-1}} \{(a^{n-1}, a) : a \in A \}.$

More text, then I have something like the following
$(-3, 3)^{C}$ in $A = (-\infty, -3] \cup [3, \infty)$.

\end{document}


The complicated formula is best set in display mode; no added spaces around the colon, possibly instead after \{ and before \}.

The second case has a big flaw: the word "in" must go outside math mode because it's text. If you want to avoid a break at \cup, write

\cup\nobreak


but leave these decisions for when the document is complete.

My answer to this is not to write math like that; whenever I have an "overfull hbox" because of inline math, I realize that said math is way too complicated to be inline and switch it to a display. Basically any math other than single symbols or, I suppose, very simple statements like $x \in Y$, should be displayed simply for reasons of good style.

To nitpick your code itself: if you are writing any kind of serious math you will probably want to use the amsmath package, which provides many helpful features and some improvements to the default ones. In this case, it provides \colon, which is modified to have nice spacing of the sort you have given, and \text, which is a superior alternative to \textrm in math mode.

• When you say "display," do you mean put inside $...$ so that the math text is on its own line? I may want to write something as simple as $A = B \cup C$ within a paragraph, and if that happened to be towards the end of the line, LaTeX would automatically insert a line break after the \cup... Dec 14, 2011 at 6:29
• @jamaicanworm: Yes, I mean that. If you want to discourage a particular break you may put braces around that part: $A = {B \cup C}$, which in math mode has the effect of creating an unbreakable \hbox, but beware that this increases the likelihood of the expression becoming too long and making an overfull \hbox. Don't expect anything you put in the text to have total visual integrity; that is exactly what a display is for. Dec 14, 2011 at 6:33
• Actually, \colon is meant for expressions like $f\colon A\to B$. I see nothing wrong with $\{x:x>0\}$, but you can always say \newcommand{\setselector}[2]{\{#1\,:\,#2\}} (or put | in place of :). Dec 14, 2011 at 7:43
• @mbork: I actually prefer to use \mid for set-building notation, but @jamaicanworm put some effort into making the colon look good so I figured he'd want the version that does it automatically. In this case, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Dec 14, 2011 at 7:49
• @Ryan: Using \nobreak (as egreg suggests) is superior to {...} since the former doesn't effect the spacing of the formula. The latter causes the spaces to be set to their natural width. Jun 24, 2012 at 17:29