Today, TeX is a big program, LuaTeX, PDFTeX, METAPOST etc. Where is the public accessing source code for hacking LuaTeX or other implementations. For example, I need to embed TeX into C program or creating Ruby object TeX.


3 Answers 3


TeX Live:





  • 2
    The LuaTeX repository just screams "we don't want any contributions"
    – piegames
    Jan 28, 2021 at 14:20

The complete sources from which TeX Live is built are available to browse online on a GitHub mirror (note that this is not the upstream source which is a private SVN).


Therein you can find the source for the different components:

The experimental LuaTeX also has its own GitHub mirror. There you can find the source in the directory source/texk/web2c/luatexdir.

  • broken links for the sub links. Dec 31, 2018 at 22:58
  • 2
    @GodMustBeCrazy The branch has been renamed from master to trunk. I fixed the links. Dec 31, 2018 at 23:27
  • Either not, or no longer a private SVN, I reckon: tug.org/svn/texlive May 11, 2023 at 20:13



This is a good starting point.



  • Luatex link not workin. SVN repository have password. This is wrong answer Aug 8, 2017 at 12:47
  • 6
    @MarkoLustro I don't follow how it's wrong: that is the official master repo for LuaTeX. One could get the TeX Live version (tug.org/texlive/svn), which if you are happy with 'reasonable approximation to current release' is OK, but it's not the 'master' source.
    – Joseph Wright
    Aug 8, 2017 at 12:59
  • 4
    Username:anonsvn Password:anonsvn
    – Neelix
    Aug 8, 2017 at 13:03
  • 4
    A "quick" search does not immediately reveal the username and password. (Thanks, Neelix.) However, is it not the case that luatex is distributed under an open license that requires the source code to be publicly available? Why should there be a username and password, even if known?
    – user139954
    Aug 8, 2017 at 15:09
  • 1
    It is not that uncommon to require a publicly available username and password for a free repo. However, if 'ask for it' in @JosephWright 's sense means 'email somebody or fill in a form or ....' then that might be problematic for some free licences. But unless they're releasing binaries of the master, it is unlikely to violate anything, so long as source of the releases is easily available. Few (no?) licences say you have to release code for stuff you don't distribute.
    – cfr
    Sep 5, 2018 at 22:16

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .