I am fairly new to TeX, and I am currently using TexStudio.
I am wondering how I can exactly replicate the typesetting of the integral below, including the font and the upright integral sign? What packages, what font?
Thank you.
-
Did you mean to delete the screenshot?– MicoAug 14, 2017 at 7:41
-
1@satokun Please reupload your screenshot. This question is now pretty much worthless for the community.– HoleneAug 14, 2017 at 8:18
-
Saying that you prefer egreg's solution can not be a good reason for deleting the initial screenshot. As @Holene has pointed out, the entire query is worthless -- and should probably be deleted -- without that screenshot.– MicoAug 14, 2017 at 9:19
Add a comment
|
3 Answers
This seems quite similar to newtxmath with the upint option:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{newtxtext}
\usepackage[upint]{newtxmath}
\newcommand{\diff}{\mathop{}\!d}
\begin{document}
\[
\int x^n\diff x
\]
\end{document}
-
2I'm always puzzled when I see an accepted answer with 0 score. Time to change that :) Aug 11, 2017 at 9:34
Basic math is included in LaTeX without any additional packages. I would write:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\[ \int x^n\, \mathrm{d}x \]
\end{document}
If you just type dx instead of \mathrm{d}x, the d will be put in italic (like in your example).
answered Aug 11, 2017 at 7:53
-
1Thank you for the answer. But this produces a slanted integral sign. How can I make it straight?– satokunAug 11, 2017 at 7:57
-
In this case, check the following question: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/222243/… Aug 11, 2017 at 7:58
-
1
\textis completely wrong here. There are so many people misusing\textin this way. Here\mathrmshould be used, not\text.\texthas one and one use only (except forsiunitxwhich "misuses" it a bit): textual comments in displayed math. This is clearly not such a case.– daleifAug 11, 2017 at 7:59 -
1@daleif Thanks for pointing it out, you are completely right. I changed my answer accordingly. Aug 11, 2017 at 8:01
-
Thanks again. I somehow missed the comma when reading the comment. Either my eyes are too bad or my screen is too small :) Aug 11, 2017 at 8:32
Ok, you are new to \LaTeX. Here is your answer. I am also teaching you how to specify the limits of integration:
$\displaystyle \int_a^b x^n \, dx$
The \, directive inserts a thinspace between the integrand and the variable of integration; this is commonly done in (good) math typography.
If you need an expression without limits of integration:
$\displaystyle \int x^n \, dx$
-
I've taken the liberty of streamlining your answer a bit; feel free to revert if you disagree with the changes.– MicoAug 14, 2017 at 7:48