I have an equation contained inside \[...\], which automatically makes a \sum with sub- and superscripts turn big--so that the summation sign looks awkward inside parenthesis. Any idea how to make the parenthesis completely enclose the whole summation?

We have:
\[ \sum_{i=1}^n i = (\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} i) + n =
\frac{(n-1)(n)}{2} + n = \frac{n(n+1)}{2} \]

The usual thing to do is replace ( with \left( and ) with \right), which automatically expand to fit the material between them. Note that every \left... requires a \right... (but the type of bracket may be different, i.e. \left(...\right] also works).

I would typeset your equation as

\sum_{i=1}^n i = \left(\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} i\right) + n =
\frac{(n-1)(n)}{2} + n = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}

enter image description here

For manual control of sizes (most of the time you won't need these)

( \big( \Big( \bigg( \Bigg(


enter image description here

  • 1
    The environment I use is from the amsmath package, so yours is actually more general. I just find [...] to look messy. Alternatively there is the displaymath environment. – qubyte Dec 20 '11 at 6:56
  • 2
    @jamaicanworm: amsmath defines \[...\] to be exactly the same as \begin{equation*}...\end{equation*}. See, literally, the last couple of lines of amsmath.sty. – Werner Dec 20 '11 at 7:26
  • 4
    @jamaicanworm The shape of the brackets is down to the font I'm afraid. If you don't like the larger curved brackets, try the square ones \left[...\right]. These often look better for larger equations. Another thing to take into account is that you're enclosing something relatively thin in those brackets. I suspect it will only look more natural when there's more between them (try putting the n to the left of the sum and loosing the brackets altogether). – qubyte Dec 20 '11 at 7:29
  • 14
    I would be a bit careful using \left/right around sums etc. because they often become too large. I tend to recommend users to: Scale the fences (parenteses and such) such that it is clear to the read what they fence in, but not to such an extend that the fences dominate the expression. – daleif Dec 20 '11 at 12:36
  • 8
    @MarkS.Everitt I disagree with this comment of yours "most of the times you won't need these" about the \big... family of commands. In fact, I personally believe that most of the times one shouldn't use the \left...\right construct; the family of \big... commands produces much better spacing (both vertically and horizontally) in most situations; besides you don't need to match them across lines in a display. – Gonzalo Medina Apr 12 '13 at 20:19

Automatically sized parentheses are obtained with \left and \right, as any LaTeX guide or manual tells.

However, automatic sizing is not good in every case; one of these cases is precisely that of summations with limits above and below: compare the results of

\left( \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} i \right)\biggl(\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} i\biggr)

enter image description here

(the font is that obtained with \usepackage{fouriernc}). In general the second way is to be preferred.

  • 4
    Do you have a reference explaining why the size is bad on the left sum? – Vincent Guillemot Feb 2 '15 at 10:31
  • 3
    @VincentGuillemot The TeXbook, for instance. – egreg Feb 2 '15 at 10:54
  • 2
    OK, thks. Let me rephrase my comment: the argument "it's prettier" (used in the TeXBook) leaves me a little bit disappointed. Isn't there a more substantial reason hidden behind this aspiration to prettyness? – Vincent Guillemot Feb 2 '15 at 12:51
  • 20
    I find the former to be prettier. – JAB Feb 2 '16 at 15:42
  • Prettier or not, sometimes some publications simply require the right style and then this answer comes so handy! However with today's MikTex I am getting File fouriernc.sty' not found.` and it looks like just including the package is not enough. This file has to beinstalled manually. – aiag Feb 5 '17 at 17:52

One way is using \left and \right, followed by the parenthesis you want to use. These are mostly () [] {} \langle\rangle and |. You can also use a . to have no parenthesis displayed, e.g. when you want an opening, but no closing one.

\left( \frac12 \right)
\left\langle \frac23 \right.
\left\{ \frac34 \right]


enter image description here

If you want to control the size manually, use (in ascending order) \big, \Big, \bigg, \Bigg.

( \frac12 \big)
\Bigg\langle \frac23 \big]
\Big\{ \frac34 \Bigg.

results in

enter image description here

  • 13
    One should use \bigl in front of the left delimiter and \bigr in front of the right delimiter (similarly for \Bigl-\Bigr and the others). This is important for spacing. – egreg Dec 20 '11 at 7:40
  • 2
    @egreg: When should one use just plain \big and friends? i.e., without the l|r suffix? – morbusg Dec 20 '11 at 10:34
  • 4
    \big and friends can go in front of ordinaries: \big/ or \big|. – egreg Dec 20 '11 at 11:41
  • 4
    @egreg at least as long as \big| is not a part of a pair: \big|-x\big|\neq \bigl|-x\bigr| – daleif Dec 20 '11 at 12:34
  • I was just looking for a way to adjust { size by the formula inclosed in it. I used \left{. your answer was great. it learned me to use \left\{ instead – Sepideh Abadpour Aug 8 '15 at 10:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.