This question already has an answer here:

enter image description here

Dear all,

I have a problem with justifying text. The last word in a sentence, for example "Keynesian" is cut into "Key-" at the end of the first sentence and "nesian" at the beginning of the following sentence.

As I send the paper for review, some reviewers do not agree with this presentation. How can I still justify the text but keep the whole word?

Thanks for your comments. Another example to illustrate the problem. If I add some letter before "Keynesian", as you can see, the word "Keynesian" jumps to next line without being splitting.

enter image description here

marked as duplicate by Peter Grill, Mico, Mensch, Mike Renfro, Henri Menke Sep 22 '17 at 0:06

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 1
    You can make it unbreakable by using \mbox{Keynesian}. – TeXnician Sep 20 '17 at 10:24
  • 2
    You may add \hyphenation{keynesian} in the document preamble. – egreg Sep 20 '17 at 10:24
  • Isn't this case sensitive? Thus \hyphenation{Keynesian}? Oxford Spelling Dictionary suggests \hyphenation{Keynes-ian} btw. – Florian Sep 20 '17 at 10:56
  • @Florian it is case insensitive. – user4686 Sep 20 '17 at 11:34
  • 2
    I can understand an objection to “Key-nesian” but not to “in-significant”. Hyphenation for better justification is a practice that has been in use for centuries; reviewers should concentrate on the text and not impose their disputable views on typography. – egreg Sep 21 '17 at 22:55